2003
DOI: 10.1515/advg.2003.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automorphisms of nearly finite Coxeter groups

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Suppose that W is an infinite Coxeter group of finite rank n, and suppose that W has a finite parabolic subgroup W J of rank n − 1. Suppose also that the Coxeter diagram of W has no edges with infinite labels. Then any automorphism of W that preserves reflections lies in the subgroup of Aut(W ) generated by the inner automorphisms and the automorphisms induced by symmetries of the Coxeter graph. If, in addition, W J is irreducible and every conjugacy class of reflections in W has nonempty intersectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining cases follow from Franzsen and Howlett [8,Theorem 31], since the automorphisms˛ ;˛ ;˛ in Theorem 31 induce the identity on OEW; W (since OEW; W is the kernel of ; and ), and the remaining automorphisms described in the generating sets are reflection preserving. The next lemma is known to experts; for a proof, see Paris [12].…”
Section: The Simplex Matching Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The remaining cases follow from Franzsen and Howlett [8,Theorem 31], since the automorphisms˛ ;˛ ;˛ in Theorem 31 induce the identity on OEW; W (since OEW; W is the kernel of ; and ), and the remaining automorphisms described in the generating sets are reflection preserving. The next lemma is known to experts; for a proof, see Paris [12].…”
Section: The Simplex Matching Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We are grateful to Parimala for her unshakable interest in triality, in particular for many discussions at earlier stages of this work and we specially thank J-P. Serre for communicating to us his results on Witt and cohomological invariants of the group W (D 4 ). We also thank Emmanuel Kowalski who introduced us to Magma [2] with much patience, Jean Barge for his help with Galois cohomology and J. E. Humphreys and B. Mühlherr for the reference to the paper [8]. The paper [10] on octic fields was a very useful source of inspiration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Now y restricts to the identity on ½C n ; C n , and so by composing f with y in the latter case, we may assume that fðB n Þ ¼ B n . Every automorphism of B n is inner by [3,Theorem 31]. Hence f restricts to conjugation on ½B n ; B n by an element of B n .…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%