2012
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.075432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous measurement of ingestion and digestion processes in free swimming sharks

Abstract: Summary Direct measurement of predator feeding events would represent a major advance in marine trophic ecology. To date, devices available for empirically quantifying feeding in free-swimming fishes have relied on measuring stomach temperature, pH or physical motility, each of which has major, practical limitations. We hypothesized that the considerable physical changes which occur in the stomachs of carnivorous predators during the processes of ingestion and digestion should be quantifiable us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last two decades, researchers have attempted to record the feeding behaviours of predators in nature using electronic devices, such as animal-borne video cameras (Davis et al, 1999;Watanabe and Takahashi, 2013), stomach/oesophageal temperature and impedance telemetry (Austin et al, 2006;Hanuise et al, 2010;Meyer and Holland, 2012), and accelerometers/hall sensors attached to jaws or heads (Hanuise et al, 2010;Naito et al, 2013;Watanabe and Takahashi, 2013;Wilson et al, 2002). However, very few studies have attempted to distinguish prey types (Wilson et al, 2002), except for studies using cameras.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last two decades, researchers have attempted to record the feeding behaviours of predators in nature using electronic devices, such as animal-borne video cameras (Davis et al, 1999;Watanabe and Takahashi, 2013), stomach/oesophageal temperature and impedance telemetry (Austin et al, 2006;Hanuise et al, 2010;Meyer and Holland, 2012), and accelerometers/hall sensors attached to jaws or heads (Hanuise et al, 2010;Naito et al, 2013;Watanabe and Takahashi, 2013;Wilson et al, 2002). However, very few studies have attempted to distinguish prey types (Wilson et al, 2002), except for studies using cameras.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic techniques may provide some critical validation, because we would predict that adult females show philopatry to Oahu (e.g., Mourier and Planes 2013). Finally, novel electronic tags soon will be able to identify specific behaviors such as feeding and mating so that we can investigate whether immigration to particular islands leads to increased feeding rates (Papastamatiou et al 2008, Meyer and Holland 2012, Whitney et al 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinguishing foraging attempts and successful ingestion can help better inform energy budgets and foraging strategies which can be particularly relevant for species such as large predatory sharks that may forage only occasionally [35]. This approach could also be extended to ectothermic species by recording additional measurements such as impedance [28] that can reflect digestive activity when temperature alone cannot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in many cases ingestion results in stomach temperature reductions attributable to the potential cooler temperature of the prey, or food item, and associated influx of ambient water. These reductions in temperature or dips can be used to mark the initiation of the feeding event [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation