2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous Surface Vessel with Remote Human on the Loop: System Design for STCW Compliance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea that engineers can use existing international crew and safety regulations as a benchmark when developing uncrewed and potentially autonomous vessels has previously been introduced in (Stones, 2017). (Dittmann, 2021), too, discusses how STCW compliance can serve as basis for the development of an autonomous vessel. The current paper, however, compares the content of the WR with (i) a class society guideline to autonomous and remotely operated ships (DNVGL-CG-0264, 2018), ii) the MASS UK Industry Conduct Principles and Code of Practice (UK MASS Code of Practice, 2021) and (iii) scientific literature related to uncrewed and autonomous vessels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea that engineers can use existing international crew and safety regulations as a benchmark when developing uncrewed and potentially autonomous vessels has previously been introduced in (Stones, 2017). (Dittmann, 2021), too, discusses how STCW compliance can serve as basis for the development of an autonomous vessel. The current paper, however, compares the content of the WR with (i) a class society guideline to autonomous and remotely operated ships (DNVGL-CG-0264, 2018), ii) the MASS UK Industry Conduct Principles and Code of Practice (UK MASS Code of Practice, 2021) and (iii) scientific literature related to uncrewed and autonomous vessels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an overview of the architecture of the implemented system the reader is referred to [37], for details regarding the sensor fusion please see [38] or [39].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During periods of unattended bridge operation of the vessel, i.e., when the crew onboard the vessel is performing other duties, the shore-based crew of the Remote Control Centre will assume the responsibilities of the Watch Keeping Officer. A critical factor is the shared and sliding responsibility, as described in [33], which describes the mapping from STCW competence requirements to autonomy module functionality. The system engineering process must include the RCC and the autonomy system onboard the vessel, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: G Autonomy Enabling Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%