1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1982.tb00439.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoradiography: its methodology at the present time

Abstract: SUMMARY The autoradiographic methods used in biological and medical research are reviewed from an historical viewpoint. It is pointed out that early methodological research was directed at the selection of suitable detector substances for radiation (nuclear emulsions) and at the preparation and application of suitable layers of these detectors to biological samples. On the other hand, later research was more concentrated on aspects of the preparation of the biological components of the specimens. In particular… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grayscale values were obtained for isodense bands identified for each probe, corrected for tissue background, and then converted to optical density (OD). OD values were then converted to amount of radioactivity bound (in nCi/g), determined from calibrated [ 14 C]microscale standards (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) (Akbarian et al, 1996;Downs and Williams, 1984;Williams, 1982), which had been exposed alongside the slides for each probe. Using the number of uridine residues contained in each subclone and specific activity of [ 35 S]UTP, bound radioactivity was converted to concentration of mRNA per isodense band, expressed as femtomoles of mRNA per gram of tissue (fmol/g) (Clinton et al, 2003;McCullumsmith et al, 2003).…”
Section: In Situ Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grayscale values were obtained for isodense bands identified for each probe, corrected for tissue background, and then converted to optical density (OD). OD values were then converted to amount of radioactivity bound (in nCi/g), determined from calibrated [ 14 C]microscale standards (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) (Akbarian et al, 1996;Downs and Williams, 1984;Williams, 1982), which had been exposed alongside the slides for each probe. Using the number of uridine residues contained in each subclone and specific activity of [ 35 S]UTP, bound radioactivity was converted to concentration of mRNA per isodense band, expressed as femtomoles of mRNA per gram of tissue (fmol/g) (Clinton et al, 2003;McCullumsmith et al, 2003).…”
Section: In Situ Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and reproducibility of in situ hybridization has previously been well characterized (Williams, 1982;Downs and Williams, 1984;Stolz et al, 1989). mRNA expression was measured by in situ hybridization using subclones that were generated by amplifying unique segments of 2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase (Abbreviation: CNP, Genebank accession number: NM_03313, region used for probe: 523-1066), myelinassociated glycoprotein (MAG, XM_01287, 305-835), transferrin (TF, XM_00279, 1172-1940, quaking (QKI, AF142421, 508-715), gelsolin (GSN, XM_01654, 1249-1649, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG, U18800, 109-263), v-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 3 (ErbB3, NM_00198, 3081-3325), erbb2 interacting protein (ErbB2IP, NM_01869, 3531-3858), motility-related protein-1 (CD9, M38690, 330-666), SRY-box containing gene 10 (SOX10, BL007595, 1337-1560), oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 (OLIG2, NM_00580, 423-628), peripheral myelin protein 22 (PMP22, BC019040, 293-637), and Claudin-11 (CLDN11, NM_00560, 610-821) from a human cDNA brain library (Human Adult Brain Unamplified cDNA Library, Edge Biosystems; Gaithersburg, MD) and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).…”
Section: In Situ Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low magnification the depth of focus of the objective is in general sufficient to document the structure of the section and the layer of silver grains. However, an intense stain of the section can cause difficulties in the recognition of subcellular structures and thus in the interpretation of the autoradiographic results (Williams, 1977(Williams, , 1982Rogers, 1979). The highly recommended technique of photographing LM autoradiographs by the double exposure technique, such as combining a dark-field image of a silver grain layer with a transmitted light picture of the specimen, is not possible for many types of tissue sections.…”
Section: Problems In the Photographic Documentation Of Semithin Sectimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual silver grains and structural details of a sectioned embryonic nucleus are now clearly documented. Considering the particularly good resolution of 'H-thymidine autoradiography (Salpeter et al, 1974;Fakan, 1976;Williams, 1977Williams, , 1982Rogers, 1979), video microscopic evaluation of contrast image obtained by high-magnification conventional light microscopy. The outlines of the nuclear structure can easily be recognized, whereas the grains can hardly be identified.…”
Section: Documentation Of Semithin Section Autoradiography At High Lmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation