1994
DOI: 10.1101/gad.8.13.1514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoregulatory control of E2F1 expression in response to positive and negative regulators of cell cycle progression.

Abstract: Both positive and negative signals govern the progression of cells from G1 into S phase, and a variety of data implicate the E2F transcription factor as a target for the action of one class of negative regulators, the Rb family of growth suppressors. We now find that the E2F1 gene, which encodes one of the components of E2F activity, is subject to autoregulatory control during progression from Go to S phase and that this primarily reflects a negative control in Go and early G1, a time when the majority of E2F … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

41
477
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 487 publications
(520 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
41
477
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 6, CAT transcript level is almost undetectable when the cells are quiescent (G0/G1 phase), whereas 12 h following the addition of serum, which corresponds to the G1/S transition, the CAT transcript level peaks. Therefore, the quail E2F-1 transcription is also strongly activated at the G1/S transition, as has been shown for the human and murine homologs of the E2F-1 gene (Johnson et al 1994;Hsiao 1994;Neuman et al, 1996). This result also indicates that the proE2F-CAT construct possesses most, if not all, regulatory elements allowing regulation of E2F-1 transcription in a cell cycle-dependent manner.…”
Section: Regulation Of E2f-1 Promoter Activity During the Cell Cyclesupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figure 6, CAT transcript level is almost undetectable when the cells are quiescent (G0/G1 phase), whereas 12 h following the addition of serum, which corresponds to the G1/S transition, the CAT transcript level peaks. Therefore, the quail E2F-1 transcription is also strongly activated at the G1/S transition, as has been shown for the human and murine homologs of the E2F-1 gene (Johnson et al 1994;Hsiao 1994;Neuman et al, 1996). This result also indicates that the proE2F-CAT construct possesses most, if not all, regulatory elements allowing regulation of E2F-1 transcription in a cell cycle-dependent manner.…”
Section: Regulation Of E2f-1 Promoter Activity During the Cell Cyclesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Analysis of the sequence of the promoter region also shows a good conservation between mammalian and avian species, especially near the two double E2F binding sites found as tandem repeats close to the transcription start site (Johnson et al, 1994;Hsiao et al, 1994;Neuman et al, 1996). Analysis of E2F-1 gene expression during the cell cycle has shown that this gene is only activated at the G1/S transition, like its mammalian homologs (Johnson et al 1994;Hsiao, 1994;Neuman et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a control we used the GAPDH gene ( Figure 4b) which displays only modest cell cycle variations in rodent Âźbroblast (Johnson et al, 1994). As anticipated from previous results with other mouse Âźbroblasts (Slansky and Farnham, 1996), there was signiÂźcant E2F-3 mRNA present in the quiescent cells.…”
Section: E2f-3 Accumulation Peaks During Dna Synthesis In Both Normalmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…6g). Given the autoregulatory control of E2F1 expression,28 decreases in E2F1 protein levels are assumed to reduce the activity of the E2F1 promoter, thereby leading to the downregulation of the entire E2F1‐mediated transcriptional network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%