Autotransfusion in the subhuman primate

Wright, Creighton B.; Geelhoed, Glenn W.; Mason, K. G.

doi:10.1016/0002-9610(74)90233-5

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, there were three separate studies on the effect of femoral vein occlusion on femoral arterial inflow in mongrel dogs and the subhuman primate from 1972 to 1974. [31][32][33] The immediate decrease in femoral arterial flow ranged from 66% to 77.5%, and a 55% decrease was still noted 24 hours later in the primate. [31][32][33] Whether these data apply to ligation of the common femoral or femoral vein in the human is unclear.…”

Section: Korean War (1950-1953)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[31][32][33] The immediate decrease in femoral arterial flow ranged from 66% to 77.5%, and a 55% decrease was still noted 24 hours later in the primate. [31][32][33] Whether these data apply to ligation of the common femoral or femoral vein in the human is unclear.…”

Section: Korean War (1950-1953)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The increasing clinical interest in venous repair during the Vietnam War was accompanied by laboratory studies on the same topic. For example, there were three separate studies on the effect of femoral vein occlusion on femoral arterial inflow in mongrel dogs and the subhuman primate from 1972 to 1974 31–33 . The immediate decrease in femoral arterial flow ranged from 66% to 77.5%, and a 55% decrease was still noted 24 hours later in the primate 31–33 .…”

Section: Vietnam War (1955–1975)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Review article: History of venous trauma

Feliciano

Kochuba

Rozycki

2021

J Trauma Acute Care Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a literature review on the history of venous trauma since the 1800s, especially that to the common femoral, femoral and popliteal veins, with focus on the early 1900s, World War I, World War II, Korean War, Vietnam War, and then civilian and military reviews . In the latter two groups, tables were used to summarize the following: incidence of venous repair versus ligation, management of popliteal venous injuries, patency of venous repairs when assessed <30 days from operation, patency of venous repairs when assessed >30 days from operation, clinical assessment (edema or not) after ligation versus repair, incidence of deep venous thrombosis after ligation versus repair, and incidence of pulmonary embolism after ligation versus repair. There is a lack of the following in the literature on the management of venous injuries over the past 80 years: standard definition of magnitude of venous injury in operative reports, accepted indications for venous repair, standard postoperative management, and timing and mode of early and later postoperative assessment. Multiple factors have entered into the decision on venous ligation versus repair after trauma for the past 60 years, but a surgeon's training and local management protocols have the most influence in both civilian and military centers. Ligation of venous injuries, particularly those in the lower extremities, is well tolerated in civilian trauma, although there is the usual lack of short-and long-term follow-up as noted in many of the articles reviewed.

show abstract