2016
DOI: 10.1650/condor-15-71.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Available data support protection of the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher under the Endangered Species Act

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers have questioned the subspecies designation of the southwestern willow flycatcher, suggesting that it is a peripheral population of an otherwise widespread species with no evidence for ecological distinctiveness (Zink ), although this suggestion has been questioned (Theimer et al . ). Here, we use ecological genomics to investigate the potential for ecological distinctiveness within the willow flycatcher as well as the potential role of rising global temperatures on its future persistence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some researchers have questioned the subspecies designation of the southwestern willow flycatcher, suggesting that it is a peripheral population of an otherwise widespread species with no evidence for ecological distinctiveness (Zink ), although this suggestion has been questioned (Theimer et al . ). Here, we use ecological genomics to investigate the potential for ecological distinctiveness within the willow flycatcher as well as the potential role of rising global temperatures on its future persistence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Population declines have been attributed to loss of riparian habitats in the Southwest following dam-building, water diversions, groundwater pumping, urbanisation, agricultural development and livestock grazing (Service 2002), but the role that climate change may have played in declines is unknown. Some researchers have questioned the subspecies designation of the southwestern willow flycatcher, suggesting that it is a peripheral population of an otherwise widespread species with no evidence for ecological distinctiveness (Zink 2015), although this suggestion has been questioned (Theimer et al 2016). Here, we use ecological genomics to investigate the potential for ecological distinctiveness within the willow flycatcher as well as the potential role of rising global temperatures on its future persistence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In my opinion, Theimer et al [12] misrepresent how the USFWS interpreted the DPS and misinterpret this part of the ESA and subsequent amendments. Specifically, contra Theimer et al [12], the ESA does not state that "gene flow among adjoining populations will necessarily result in a complex boundary where genes and the phenotypic traits associated with them intergrade, making designations of subspecies and DPS boundaries difficult" [12].…”
Section: Taxonomy Range and Interpreting The Us Endangered Speciementioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is important to consider how agencies interpret taxonomic categories relative to interpretations by researchers. Theimer et al [12] cite a portion of a 1973 amendment to the ESA concerning taxonomic categories, which stated that protection could be applied to "any subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants, and any distinct population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife which interbreeds when mature". The Endangered Species Act in 1973 defined "species" to include "subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants and any other group of fish or wildlife of the same species or smaller taxa in common spatial arrangement that interbreed when mature."…”
Section: Taxonomy Range and Interpreting The Us Endangered Speciementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation