2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-72992006000300002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação da voz em pacientes submetidos à cordectomia com laser de CO2

Abstract: Aim: To evaluate voice outcomes in patients with early glottic carcinoma treated by CO 2 laser cordectomy. Method: 15 patients with glottic Tis and T1 squamous cell carcinoma treated with CO 2 laser were analyzed. The assessment consisted of perceptual voice analysis, objective voice evaluation and video-laryngo-stroboscopic exam. In addition, patients rated their voices and completed the Voice related Quality of Life (VR-QOL) questionnaire. The results were compared with those obtained in a matched control gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1- Analysis of vocal auditory perception, through the GRBASI scale (11) (G = grade of hoarseness, R = level of roughness, B = breathiness, A = asthenia, S = strain, and I = instability) which are classified from 0 to 3, with 0 = no alteration; 1 = slight alteration; 2 = moderate alteration; and 3 = severe alteration [ 12 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1- Analysis of vocal auditory perception, through the GRBASI scale (11) (G = grade of hoarseness, R = level of roughness, B = breathiness, A = asthenia, S = strain, and I = instability) which are classified from 0 to 3, with 0 = no alteration; 1 = slight alteration; 2 = moderate alteration; and 3 = severe alteration [ 12 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The speech language evaluation included: directed anamnesis for the symptoms (dysphonia, nasal obstruction, odynophagia and dysphagia); auditory perceptive evaluation through the GRBAS [14] scale that evaluates grade of hoarseness (G), considering level of roughness (R), breathiness (B), asthenia (A) and strain (S), which are classified from 0 to 3, with 0 = normal, 1 = slightl, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe [16] ; phonation time assessment with maximum phonation time (MPT) of the sustained vowel/a/ and ratio between voiced and voiceless fricatives (S/Z). Along of the voice acoustic analysis, the voice of the patients was recorded in quiet environment, directly in the computer for better capture of the voice by Vox Metria software (CTS Informática, Pato Branco, Brazil).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O QVV vem sendo apontado como importante instrumento para a avaliação e compreensão do impacto da disfonia na vida do indivíduo e tem sido cada vez mais utilizado em diversas pesquisas da Fonoaudiologia, como em professores (GILLIVAN-MURPHY et al, 2006, JARDIM, BARRETO, ASSUNÇÃO, 2007PENTEADO, 2003;GRILLO E PENTEADO, 2005;PENTEADO E PEREIRA, 2007), pacientes submetidos a cirurgias de remoção de câncer de laringe (CARMO, CAMARGO, NEMR, 2006;HADDAD et al, 2006); indivíduos disartrofônicos (VEIGA, et al, 2006) Life -BREF/ WHOQOL-breve) e qualitativos (grupos focais). Observou-se que a saúde geral dos professores encontra-se comprometida, por sofrimentos de ordem física e emocional e problemas e necessidades de saúde geral e vocal, sendo de grande importância as ações de promoção da saúde docente.…”
Section: Promoção De Saúde E Qualidade De Vidaunclassified