2020
DOI: 10.32635/2176-9745.rbc.2020v66n1.777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação do Impacto da Higiene Oral Associada ao Uso do Chá de Camomila no Desenvolvimento de Mucosite Oral: Estudo-Piloto

Abstract: Introdução: A mucosite oral (MO) representa uma condição inflamatória frequente em pacientes oncológicos e uma higiene oral insatisfatória tem sido relacionada como fator predisponente para o seu surgimento. O chá de camomila vem sendo estudado como terapia adjuvante no manejo da MO em razão das suas propriedades analgésicas e anti-inflamatórias. Objetivo: Avaliar a influência do chá de camomila associada a uma rigorosa higiene oral na prevenção de MO. Método: Trata-se de um estudo-piloto clínico randomizado, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented by Barreto et al (2020) demonstrate that chamomile tea associated with the provision of information related to correct techniques for oral hygiene, obtained non-significant results. However, in this study only patients undergoing chemotherapy were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results presented by Barreto et al (2020) demonstrate that chamomile tea associated with the provision of information related to correct techniques for oral hygiene, obtained non-significant results. However, in this study only patients undergoing chemotherapy were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It is known that, according to Santos et al (2011), the incidence of OM in patients undergoing cancer treatments is higher for those undergoing RT. This fact should be considered in the study by Barreto et al (2020), for presenting a selection bias when defining the study inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%