2016
DOI: 10.5380/abclima.v18i0.43059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação Estatística Entre as Estimativas De Precipitação Da Constelação GPM Com Trmm: Uma Análise a Bacia Hidrográfica Do Rio Solimões (Statistical Evaluation Between the Constellation of Precipitation Estimates With GPM Satellite Trmm: An Analysis of the River Basin Solimões)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IMERG and TMPA products demonstrate convergent performance in predicting estimates and show a tendency to behave similarly, since GPM is the successor to the TRMM mission. In corroboration, other studies also state that the performance of both is similar (SOUSA, 2016; LELIS et al 2018), but also that they suffer interference from the region in which they are used in or from the predominant type of precipitation (SERRÃO et al 2016;ZHOU et al 2015). In this regard, it is clear that the TRMM has greater sensitivity to variations in regional conditions, which can be explained by its validation with the precipitation recorded in situ (SERRÃO et al 2016).…”
Section: Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The IMERG and TMPA products demonstrate convergent performance in predicting estimates and show a tendency to behave similarly, since GPM is the successor to the TRMM mission. In corroboration, other studies also state that the performance of both is similar (SOUSA, 2016; LELIS et al 2018), but also that they suffer interference from the region in which they are used in or from the predominant type of precipitation (SERRÃO et al 2016;ZHOU et al 2015). In this regard, it is clear that the TRMM has greater sensitivity to variations in regional conditions, which can be explained by its validation with the precipitation recorded in situ (SERRÃO et al 2016).…”
Section: Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 54%