2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12555-011-0623-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Average consensus seeking of high-order continuous-time multi-agent systems with multiple time-varying communication delays

Abstract: The average consensus problem of high-order multi-agent systems with multiple timevarying communication delays is investigated in this paper. By using the idea of state decomposition, the condition for guaranteeing average consensus is converted into verifying the stability of zero equilibrium of disagreement system. Considering multiple time-varying communication delays, LyapunovKrasovskii approach in time-domain is employed to analyze the stability of zero equilibrium. With the help of Free-weighting Matrice… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, as t → ∞ , all the agents achieve consensus on x a . Therefore, the regulated output defined in describes the MAS desired behavior to achieve consensus on a constant position x a , and this completes the proof.Remark It is worth mentioning that implies a consensus protocol similar to and . For instance, in , a consensus protocol was proposed for n th‐order MASs under undirected networks as follows: xi(n)=bk=1n1xi(k)j=1Nk=0n2aijβkxi(k)xj(k), where b,β0,1,,n2double-struckR+ denoted the protocol gains, which were designed based on all the nonzero eigenvalues of the network Laplacian matrix.…”
Section: Scripth∞ Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, as t → ∞ , all the agents achieve consensus on x a . Therefore, the regulated output defined in describes the MAS desired behavior to achieve consensus on a constant position x a , and this completes the proof.Remark It is worth mentioning that implies a consensus protocol similar to and . For instance, in , a consensus protocol was proposed for n th‐order MASs under undirected networks as follows: xi(n)=bk=1n1xi(k)j=1Nk=0n2aijβkxi(k)xj(k), where b,β0,1,,n2double-struckR+ denoted the protocol gains, which were designed based on all the nonzero eigenvalues of the network Laplacian matrix.…”
Section: Scripth∞ Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The average consensus problem in high‐order MASs under undirected networks was studied in . In , the consensus problem for high‐order MASs under undirected networks and in the presence of time‐varying communication delays was studied, and in , a consensus protocol for high‐order singular MASs under directed networks was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In synchronously-coupled algorithm, self-delays introduced for each agent in the coordination part equal the corresponding communication delays, while asynchronouslycoupled algorithm requires each agent to use its delayed state with the delay different from the corresponding communication delay, or use its current state to compare with its delayed neighboring agents' states. Consensus convergence of synchronously-coupled algorithm depends on the communication delay strictly for the multi-agent systems under fixed [19,29,33,37] or switched topologies [4,6,17,24,30,32,38]. With proper control parameters, differently, the stationary consensus algorithms in asynchronously-coupled form is convergent without any relationship to the communication delay value for the first-order, second-order and high-order agents [10,11,12,21,27].…”
Section: Doi: 1014736/kyb-2018-2-0304mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One goal of this paper is to lift this constraint by considering balanced digraphs (directed graphs). Note that average consensus problem and leader-following consensus problem of high-order multi-agent systems with multiple time-varying delay are also treated in [37] and [39], respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above mentioned works [34,[36][37][38][39] implicitly assume the interaction strengths or link weights can be exactly measured. In other words, external disturbances and communication uncertainties have been ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%