Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 2018
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611975031.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Average-radius list-recoverability of random linear codes

Abstract: We analyze the list-decodability, and related notions, of random linear codes. This has been studied extensively before: there are many different parameter regimes and many different variants. Previous works have used complementary styles of arguments-which each work in their own parameter regimes but not in othersand moreover have left some gaps in our understanding of the list-decodability of random linear codes. In particular, none of these arguments work well for listrecovery, a generalization of list-deco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the downside, we note that our arguments only work for binary codes and do not extend to larger alphabets; additionally, our positive results do not establish average-radius list-decodability with list size O(1/ε), a stronger notion which was established in some of the previous works [2,43,36]. It would be very interesting to extend our results to these settings.…”
Section: :3mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the downside, we note that our arguments only work for binary codes and do not extend to larger alphabets; additionally, our positive results do not establish average-radius list-decodability with list size O(1/ε), a stronger notion which was established in some of the previous works [2,43,36]. It would be very interesting to extend our results to these settings.…”
Section: :3mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…A unified analysis. As we discuss more below, previous work on the list-decodability of random linear binary codes either work only in certain (non-overlapping) parameter regimes [12,43], or else get substantially sub-optimal bounds on the list-size [36]. Our argument obtains improved list size bounds over all these results and works in all parameter regimes.…”
Section: :3mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use the following result on the list-recoverability of random linear codes from [31]. Proof of Corollary 7.…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is easier to analyze since the problem is linearized from infinity norm to one norm. Indeed it plays a useful role in a long line of work towards understanding the list decodability of random linear codes[26,45,36,37,38].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%