2021
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202003091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avidity‐Based Selection of Tissue‐Specific CAR‐T Cells from a Combinatorial Cellular Library of CARs

Abstract: Using T‐cell chimeric antigen receptors (CAR‐T) to activate and redirect T cells to tumors expressing the cognate antigen represents a powerful approach in cancer therapy. However, normal tissues with low expression of tumor‐associated antigens (TAAs) can be mistargeted, resulting in severe side effects. An approach using a collection of T cells expressing a diverse, 106‐member combinatorial cellular library of CARs, in which members can be specifically enriched based on avidity for cell membrane antigens, is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this provides useful information regarding the scFv itself, this analysis does not consider the geography of chimeric antigen receptor or target antigen expression within the cell membrane, nor the influence of secondary binding interactions mediated by other pro-adhesive molecules. Accordingly, some studies of scFv affinity have proven poorly predictive of CAR function ( 36 ). To measure the global strength of interaction between our panel of CD19-specific CAR T-cells and a target cell that expresses this antigen, we undertook z-Movi avidity testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this provides useful information regarding the scFv itself, this analysis does not consider the geography of chimeric antigen receptor or target antigen expression within the cell membrane, nor the influence of secondary binding interactions mediated by other pro-adhesive molecules. Accordingly, some studies of scFv affinity have proven poorly predictive of CAR function ( 36 ). To measure the global strength of interaction between our panel of CD19-specific CAR T-cells and a target cell that expresses this antigen, we undertook z-Movi avidity testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S-trimer-His and SA3-hFc were crosslinked using collision-induced dissociation (CID)cleavable cross-linker, disuccinimidyl sulfoxide (DSSO) following the described procedure [22]. Briefly, S-trimer-His and SA3-hFc were mixed in PBS and incubated for 30 min at RT.…”
Section: Chemical Crosslinking and Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While simple in principle, the modular design of CARs can become quite complex, with factors such as the affinity of the scFv, the length of the extracellular hinge region, the structure of the transmembrane region, and the identities of the intracellular costimulatory domains each having a significant impact on the final CAR activity 139 . At present, it is not possible to reliably predict how a specific CAR design will function without laborious empirical testing 140 , and while large libraries (10 6 constructs) of CARs can be generated and transferred into immune cells simultaneously, only a small fraction of the total library can be analyzed 141,142 . The functional screening technologies described herein may be able to address the screening bottleneck of synthetic CAR molecules by translating functional CAR assessment into a high-throughput screening process that can analyze entire CAR libraries using functional cell sorting technologies.…”
Section: Limitation Of Current Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%