Avoidant coping strategies in adolescents in situations of social conflict: an attempt to identify personality and family indicators

Abstract

Goal
 The purpose of the study was to determine the personality and family indicators of the avoidant coping strategy in adolescent youth in situations of social conflict
 Method
 The study was conducted on a sample of 893 middle school students. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (SES) (adapted by Dzwonkowska, Lachowicz-Tabaczek and Łaguna), the Sense of Control Questionnaire (SCQ) by Krasowicz and Kurzyp-Wojnarska, the Stress Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) designed by Włodarczyk and Wrześniewski, the Three-Factor Inventory of Personality States and Traits (TIPST) by Spielberger, the Parental Attitudes Scale (PAS) Plopa, the Questionnaire for Coping Strategies in Parents in Situations of Social Conflict (QSPC) by Borecka-Biernat, and Questionnaire for Coping Strategies in Adolescents in Situations of Social Conflict (QSAC) by Borecka-Biernat were used in the study.
 Results
 Young people’s strong conviction of other individuals’ impact on negative and positive outcomes of events, the perception of social conflict as challenge and reacting to that conflict with anger or anxiety co-occurs with the tendency towards the avoidant coping strategy. Among the familial determinants of the avoidant coping strategy, an important role is played by the inadequate parental attitudes towards the adolescent child, as well as the pattern of avoidance in situations of social conflict in the parents.
 Conclusions
 Learning about the causes of the avoidant coping strategy in the young person will allow the parents and teachers to better understand the adolescents’ behaviour in situations of social conflict and look at its roots from the adolescent’s perspective. Understanding the causes of this behaviour may become a starting point for creating educational strategies that help young people cope with conflict in a mature way.

Coping and sleep quality in youth: An Experience Sampling study

“…Traditionally, previous theories (Bandura, 1977; Lazarus & Folkman, 1984) and empirical work (Boals et al, 2011; Borecka‐Biernat, 2020; Kurtović et al, 2018) investigated the unidirectional pathway of control relating to coping, as opposed to coping relating to control. While control and sleep have been linked before (Alfano et al, 2013; DeAngelis et al, 2019), no previous study explored (1) the within‐person effects of state locus of control and sleep, and (2) the mediating role of coping.…”

“…As such, engagement coping increases feelings of competence (i.e., higher control), while disengagement coping may enhance perceptions of helplessness (i.e., lower control) (Skinner & Zimmer‐Gembeck, 2011). Empirically, the relationship of locus of control affecting coping has been investigated more intensely in youth (Boals et al, 2011; Borecka‐Biernat, 2020; Doron et al, 2009; Kurtović et al, 2018), whereas studies investigating the effects of coping on control are scarce and limited to the adult population (Dijkstra & Homan, 2016). Therefore, we aim to address this gap in the literature and investigate if coping relates to state locus of control in youth.…”