2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2015.11.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding binary interaction parameters in the GC-PC-SAFT model with a parametrization based in VLE and IDAC data: n-Alkanes and 1-alkanols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In PC-SAFT, we could consider 1-alcohols as self-associative molecules with or without the dipolar term. The choice of the association schema (mainly 3B or 2B) may have a significant impact on phase equilibria computation results of mixtures. ,,, As observed in previous works, liquid–liquid and vapor–liquid equilibria of methanol-/ethanol-containing mixtures were qualitatively and quantitatively modeled using the 2B schema while explicitly accounting that the dipolar term does not improve the liquid–liquid prediction of such kind of mixtures. , However, the addition of the dipolar term was shown necessary to correctly represent the liquid–liquid equilibrium of acetic acid- or nitrile-containing mixtures where the polar force is significant. More recently, Cripwell et al have shown that including a dipolar term in the SAFT-VR Mie EoS is not necessary to improve the prediction of the phase equilibria of alcohol mixtures.…”
Section: Determination Of Mg-saft Group Parametersmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In PC-SAFT, we could consider 1-alcohols as self-associative molecules with or without the dipolar term. The choice of the association schema (mainly 3B or 2B) may have a significant impact on phase equilibria computation results of mixtures. ,,, As observed in previous works, liquid–liquid and vapor–liquid equilibria of methanol-/ethanol-containing mixtures were qualitatively and quantitatively modeled using the 2B schema while explicitly accounting that the dipolar term does not improve the liquid–liquid prediction of such kind of mixtures. , However, the addition of the dipolar term was shown necessary to correctly represent the liquid–liquid equilibrium of acetic acid- or nitrile-containing mixtures where the polar force is significant. More recently, Cripwell et al have shown that including a dipolar term in the SAFT-VR Mie EoS is not necessary to improve the prediction of the phase equilibria of alcohol mixtures.…”
Section: Determination Of Mg-saft Group Parametersmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The choice of the association schema (mainly 3B or 2B) may have a significant impact on phase equilibria computation results of mixtures. 5,21,37,38 As observed in previous works, liquid−liquid and vapor−liquid equilibria of methanol-/ethanol-containing mixtures were qualitatively and quantitatively modeled using the 2B schema 21 while explicitly accounting that the dipolar term does not improve the liquid−liquid prediction of such kind of mixtures. 26,39 However, the addition of the dipolar term was shown necessary to correctly represent the liquid−liquid equilibrium of acetic acid-3 or nitrile 4 containing mixtures where the polar force is significant.…”
Section: Determination Of Mg-saft Groupmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This was accomplished using pure compound saturation pressures ( P sat ) and saturated liquid molar volume ( v l ), collected from the literature with the aid of the NIST ThermoData Engine software . The objective function ( F obj ) for the optimization of the model parameters was as follows where NP is the number of experimental points; the “calc” superscript denotes the quantity calculated with the F-SAC-Phi, and w = 10 is a weighting factor, ,, so that priority is given to saturation pressure data.…”
Section: Cosmo-sac-phi and F-sac-phi Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where NP is the number of experimental points; the "calc" superscript denotes the quantity calculated with the F-SAC-Phi, and w = 10 is a weighting factor, 4,36,37 so that priority is given to saturation pressure data.…”
Section: Rtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies use either the two-site (2B) or the three-site (3B) scheme [2,3,5,7,8,14], but the best phase equilibrium results are obtained when the 2B scheme is used [5,7]. Good VLE results are obtained for mixtures of alcohols with alkanes as well as for cross-associating systems, often better than those when all SAFT parameters are fitted to vapor pressures and liquid densities, but in some case using additional properties (than vapor pressures and liquid densities) in the parameter estimation yields improved pure compound parameters in association equations of state [7].…”
Section: Methanol and Ethanolmentioning
confidence: 99%