“…Moreover, studies have shown that the understanding of PHWs is contributed and related to individuals: (i) knowledge, experience, and exposure on the smoking effects, (ii) their belief of the impact shown by the PHW, (iii) having adequate health literacy skills, (iv) the way and image plus language used in presenting the PHW, (v) their interpretation of the PHWs, (vi) the roles of mass media, and (vii) the ability to relate any smoking effects anatomically [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The vague understanding of the pictorial contents among most study participants in rural India contributed to the low perceptions of the effectiveness of the PHWs used in the country during the study period [ 21 ]. Moreover, in India, earlier in 2011, PHW presented using a symbol or icon was not understood and perceived as least effective by the participants compared to PHWs depicting the X-ray of a diseased lung [ 22 ].…”