1997
DOI: 10.1080/00224549709595449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Awareness of Hospital Environment and Organizational Commitment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physician sample sizes ranged from 18 to 2,635, with a third of studies having sample sizes under 100 physicians. 15,16…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Physician sample sizes ranged from 18 to 2,635, with a third of studies having sample sizes under 100 physicians. 15,16…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, it found that awareness of the external environment predicts organizational commitment among physicians whereas awareness of the internal (to the organization) environment predicts the OC of nurses. 16…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of commitment is defined by Allen and Meyer (1990) as affective commitment and is deemed more positive for performance than normative commitment, which occurs when an individual stays out of obligation, or continuance commitment, which occurs when the cost of leaving out‐ways the cost of staying. Commitment foci can also vary; for example, the work environment (Roy and Ghose, 1997), supervisors (Benkhoff, 1997), occupation or profession (Pearson and Duffy, 1999; Meyer et al , 1993), career or work ethic (Cohen, 1996). The conclusion is that regardless of foci, affective commitment in any form, will direct an individual's effort toward achieving organizational goals (Becker et al , 1996; Meyer and Smith, 2000).…”
Section: Support For Participation In Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…enjoy a com pet i tive advan tage based on the increased loy alty, com mit ment, and produc tiv ity that such pos i tive dis po si tions may engen der (Dutta Roy & Ghose, 1997;Mowday, Por ter, & Steers, 1982). What deter mines such pos i tive per cep tions of advance ment oppor tu ni ties among employ ees becomes a sig nif i cant ques tion for all orga ni za tional par tic i pants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%