2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axial and lateral stress–strain model for circular concrete-filled steel tubes with external steel confinement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where A st is the total equivalent steel area and can be calculated using Equations (8) and (9) for columns with external ring and spiral confinements, respectively.…”
Section: Prediction Of the Ultimate Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where A st is the total equivalent steel area and can be calculated using Equations (8) and (9) for columns with external ring and spiral confinements, respectively.…”
Section: Prediction Of the Ultimate Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, as the concrete Poisson's ratio is less than the steel, the lateral expansion of infilled concrete will be smaller than the steel tube at the elastic stage. Hence, no composite interaction between the two components will occur before the spreading of micro-cracks in the concrete and the beginning of inelastic outward buckling of steel [8,9]. Therefore, a different approach was suggested to strengthen the bond behaviour of CFST by utilising steel stiffeners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steel tube and concrete not only compensate each other's shortcomings but also give full play to each other's advantages. Consequently, this composite structure exhibits high bearing capacity, good plasticity, and convenient construction properties [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies have determined that the local buckling of the steel tube may result in a substantial degradation in the strength and the stiffness and a considerable reduction in the energy-absorption capacity of the CFT column (Cai et al, 2016; Sakino et al, 2004). To prevent or delay a local buckling failure of the steel tube, a number of strengthening technologies have been recently developed: (1) internal stiffeners (Abedi et al, 2008; Dabaon et al, 2009; Ding et al, 2017; Petrus et al, 2010), (2) internal reinforcing ties or binding bars (Ho and Lai, 2013; Long and Cai, 2013; Zuo et al, 2012), (3) internal loop or spiral stirrup strengthening (Ding et al, 2014), and (4) external Fiber Reinforced polymer (FRP) (Park and Choi, 2013; Teng et al, 2013; Wei et al, 2014; Yu et al, 2016) or steel bar confinement (Ho and Dong, 2014; Kwan et al, 2016; Lai and Ho, 2014). Extensive experimental results demonstrated that these strengthening methods can effectively restrain and delay local buckling of the steel tube, thus increasing the strength, ductility, and seismic resistance of CFT columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%