1993
DOI: 10.1521/pedi.1993.7.1.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axis II Comorbidity of Self-Defeating Personality Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample of 64 patients had been referred to a psychiatric service for a geographically defined catchment area that included urban and rural components, so that although this group cannot be said to be representative of PD in psychiatric populations, it is likely that the findings will have relevance to many patients in routine psychiatric practice. Nurnberg et al (4) have noted differences between previously reported patient samples in studies of SDPD and pointed out that these can influence co-occurring diagnoses. However, some of the findings in the present study are consistent with several previous reports (4,8,11,12), in that the present 20% prevalence of SDPD is within the range in previous reports (14-21%) and several co-occurring PD diagnoses is the usual finding if a PD diagnosis is present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The sample of 64 patients had been referred to a psychiatric service for a geographically defined catchment area that included urban and rural components, so that although this group cannot be said to be representative of PD in psychiatric populations, it is likely that the findings will have relevance to many patients in routine psychiatric practice. Nurnberg et al (4) have noted differences between previously reported patient samples in studies of SDPD and pointed out that these can influence co-occurring diagnoses. However, some of the findings in the present study are consistent with several previous reports (4,8,11,12), in that the present 20% prevalence of SDPD is within the range in previous reports (14-21%) and several co-occurring PD diagnoses is the usual finding if a PD diagnosis is present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurnberg et al (4) have noted differences between previously reported patient samples in studies of SDPD and pointed out that these can influence co-occurring diagnoses. However, some of the findings in the present study are consistent with several previous reports (4,8,11,12), in that the present 20% prevalence of SDPD is within the range in previous reports (14-21%) and several co-occurring PD diagnoses is the usual finding if a PD diagnosis is present. There can be poor agreement between PD diagnosis by various versions of the PDQ self-report questionnaires and by structured interviews, but concordance between interview methods has also been found to be low (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations