1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00111.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral Embolism Due to a Retained Pacemaker Lead: A Case Report

Abstract: There are only a few reported cases of a pacemaker lead migrating inadvertently into the left atrium or ventricle. An unusual complication of unremoved, unwanted pacemaker lead is presented. The free tip of the lead caused cerebral embolism after perforating the interatrial septum.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The free tip of an abandoned ventricular lead migrated into the left atrium by perforating the interatrial septum and led to a cerebral embolism 6 years after lead replacement. 7 The other serious complication was a case of pleural reaction with chill and pain due to mechanical irritation by the free tip of the retained ventricular lead that migrated into the right lung and reached the pleura. 8 Open-heart surgery was required in both cases to remove the retained lead.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free tip of an abandoned ventricular lead migrated into the left atrium by perforating the interatrial septum and led to a cerebral embolism 6 years after lead replacement. 7 The other serious complication was a case of pleural reaction with chill and pain due to mechanical irritation by the free tip of the retained ventricular lead that migrated into the right lung and reached the pleura. 8 Open-heart surgery was required in both cases to remove the retained lead.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If an infected lead is retained, the risk of treatment failure with antibiotics will be very high 7). Even non-infected lead fragment may cause embolic complications 8)9). Therefore, various extraction techniques have been tried to improve the success rate of complete lead removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management of ILMLH remains a clinical dilemma, and guidelines do not provide solid recommendations [ 8 ]. Antiplatelet therapy does not adequately protect from thromboembolic events associated with left-sided leads, as suggested in some reports [ 29 , 30 ]. In the present study, the prevalence of acute TIA/stroke at the time of diagnosis did not differ between patients treated or untreated with anticoagulants (46% versus 37%%, p = 0.469).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%