2014
DOI: 10.1101/011650
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FusionCatcher– a tool for finding somatic fusion genes in paired-end RNA-sequencing data

Abstract: is a software tool for finding somatic fusion genes in paired-end RNA-sequencing data from human or other vertebrates. achieves competitive detection rates and real-time PCR validation rates in RNA-sequencing data from tumor cells. Fusion-Catcher is available at http://code.google.com/p/fusioncatcher/.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
296
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 364 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
296
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For fusion analysis, we used STAR-fusion (STAR-Fusion_v0.5.1), 24,25 FusionCatcher (v0.99.3e), 26 and FusionSeq. 2731 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fusion analysis, we used STAR-fusion (STAR-Fusion_v0.5.1), 24,25 FusionCatcher (v0.99.3e), 26 and FusionSeq. 2731 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, many RNA-seq gene fusion discovery algorithms utilize spanning reads (one read partially aligns to both genes corresponding to the fusion junction) or encompassing reads (each read of a pair aligns to a different gene, thereby surrounding the fusion junction) such as TopHat-Fusion (Kim and Salzberg 2011), deFuse (McPherson et al 2011a), ChimeraScan , BreakFusion , FusionCatcher (Nicorici et al 2014), pyPRADA (Torres-Garcia et al 2014), and TRUP (Fernandez-Cuesta et al 2015). However, despite the successful application of these algorithms to discover gene fusions, a recent comparison of eight gene fusion discovery tools revealed a lot of variability between callers.…”
Section: [Supplemental Materials Is Available For This Article]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the performance of INTEGRATE to other available algorithms, we reanalyzed the HCC1395 data with three WGS and RNA-seq callers (Comrad [McPherson et al 2011b], nFuse [McPherson et al 2012], and BreakTrans [Chen et al 2013]) and five commonly used and recently published RNA-seq gene fusion tools (TopHat-Fusion [Kim and Salzberg 2011], ChimeraScan , FusionCatcher [Nicorici et al 2014], pyPRADA [Torres-Garcia et al 2014], and TRUP [Fernandez-Cuesta et al 2015]). BreakTrans was provided with fusion and SV candidates called by BreakDancer ).…”
Section: Application To Hcc1395 Breast Cancer Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alignment of the paired-end FASTQ files to the human reference genome (GRCh37) was performed using TopHat2 software (20) and visualized using Integrative Genomics Viewer software (21). The FASTQ files were further analyzed, to find known and/or novel fusion transcripts, using FusionCatcher software (22). To validate the presence of the TPM3-NTRK1 fusion transcript and a mutation in the kinase domain, the total RNA extracted from the two cell lines was also subjected to reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and Sanger sequencing analysis.…”
Section: Rna Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%