591CliNiCal artiCle J Neurosurg 125:591-597, 2016 I dIopathIc normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) has been a challenging entity for the past 50 years, since its first description by Hakim.21 Despite extensive research, its pathophysiological basis and pathogenesis remain matters of ongoing debate. Due to the uncertainty in diagnostic measures, several algorithms, diagnostic tools, and scoring systems have been proposed. A recent multicenter trial based the decision for surgical therapy on clinical signs and symptoms only, dividing cases into questionable and typical iNPH.23 Given the multitude of noninvasive and invasive measures to select symptomatic patients for hydrocephalus therapy, a prospective analysis of diagnostic and predictive parameters and their individual contributions within the diagnostic algorithm was warranted.
Patients and MethodsPatients with suspicious clinical and MRI signs for iNPH were examined in a prospective study. Local ethics committee approval was obtained.abbreviatioNs AMP Q = ICP amplitude quotient; ELD = external lumbar drainage; ETV = endoscopic third ventriculostomy; ICP = intracranial pressure; iNPH = idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; LIFT = lumbar infusion test; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; OVM = overnight ICP monitoring; RAP = correlation coefficient between pulse amplitude and ICP; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; ROut = resistance to outflow of CSF; SLHS = Stein and Langfitt Hydrocephalus Score; VP = ventriculoperitoneal; ∆Kiefer = change in Kiefer score. obJeCtive The aim of the study was to analyze the diagnostic and predictive values of clinical tests, CSF dynamics, and intracranial pulsatility tests, compared with external lumbar drainage (ELD), for shunt response in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Methods Sixty-eight consecutive patients with suspected iNPH were prospectively evaluated. Preoperative assessment included clinical tests, overnight intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, lumbar infusion test (LIFT), and ELD for 24-72 hours. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to identify predictive parameters concerning the outcome after shunt therapy. results Positive response to ELD correctly predicted improvement after CSF diversion in 87.9% of the patients. A Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) value below 21 was associated with nonresponse after shunt insertion (specificity 93%, sensitivity 67%). Resistance to outflow of CSF (ROut) > 12 mm Hg/ml/min was false negative in 21% of patients. Intracranial pulsatility parameters yielded different results in various parameters (correlation coefficient between pulse amplitude and ICP, slow wave amplitude, and mean ICP) but did not correlate to outcome. In multiple linear regression analysis, a calculation of presurgical MMSE versus the value after ELD, ROut, and ICP amplitude quotient during LIFT was significantly associated with outcome (p = 0.04). CoNClusioNs Despite a multitude of invasive tests, presurgical cl...