2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.06.605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B-Po03-131 Effects of Contact Force on Lesion Size During Pulsed Field Ablation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we know that for RFA differences in contact force can cause changes in the contact area between the heart tissue and the catheter tip, thus, modifying the impedance between the tip of the catheter and the tissue and the eventual lesion created 35 . For PFA, recent studies have also shown the impact of contact force for different application approaches 36 , 37 . In Supplementary Materials, the importance and complexity of contact in lesion formation for both techniques was assessed for a “worst case” contact scenario.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we know that for RFA differences in contact force can cause changes in the contact area between the heart tissue and the catheter tip, thus, modifying the impedance between the tip of the catheter and the tissue and the eventual lesion created 35 . For PFA, recent studies have also shown the impact of contact force for different application approaches 36 , 37 . In Supplementary Materials, the importance and complexity of contact in lesion formation for both techniques was assessed for a “worst case” contact scenario.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was thus shown in 21 that contact presence plays a role in ablation zone, with contact force also having a meaningful impact, albeit less sensitive than for RF ablation. Changes in electrode orientation will depend on the geometry of the catheter, including active electrode F I G U R E 4 Representative acute (>2 h) gross pathology results from the three energy settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the motile nature of the ventricles makes contact force markedly less stable. However, tested contact force was limited to a range of 15–25 g, and since PEFs were gated to the R‐wave, the deliveries were synchronized to be delivered while the ventricles are in systole, providing more consistent contact force during PEF delivery 21 …”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing preclinical work has indicated that heavily trabeculated appendages can be ablated in a durable, transmural manner with a circular PFA catheter, providing indirect evidence that PFA may result in lesions without direct electrode-tissue contact. 16 Recently, Nakagawa et al 21 reported no lesions when a focal catheter (3.5 mm irrigated TactiCath SE, Abbott) was ≈2 mm from the endocardium after PFA (Centauri, Galaxy Medical) when used in conjunction with electro-anatomical mapping and a unipolar PFA ablation system. Nevertheless, the well-controlled electrode-tissue proximity used in our study provides direct evidence of the ability of a biphasic, bipolar PFA system to create cardiac lesions in a beating heart ex vivo in the 0 mm offset distance case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%