2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-18744-6_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B-Specification of Relay-Based Railway Interlocking Systems Based on the Propositional Logic of the System State Evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formal model of an interlocking system is designed by applying various formal specification languages. Several authors successfully used Z [7][8][9][10], B [11][12][13][14], Event-B [15,16], VDM [8,9,17], CSP [11,18], CPN [19][20][21] and ASM [22] for the design of formal model of an interlocking system.…”
Section: Formal Methods For Railway Interlockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The formal model of an interlocking system is designed by applying various formal specification languages. Several authors successfully used Z [7][8][9][10], B [11][12][13][14], Event-B [15,16], VDM [8,9,17], CSP [11,18], CPN [19][20][21] and ASM [22] for the design of formal model of an interlocking system.…”
Section: Formal Methods For Railway Interlockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper by de Almeida Pereira et al [13] described the usage of the B formal method by specifying the properties of a relay-based interlocking system. With the help of propositional logic rules, they described how system states are progressing.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Book Chaptersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a way to allow the formal specification of relay-based RIS, the use of B-method as a formal language has been proposed in a previous work [10]. B-method is considered as one of the strongest approaches for the specification of railway systems [11] and its success has been proved by its use in many industrial projects ( [5], [6], [7] ).…”
Section: Formal Specification Of Relay-based Rismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are examples of using many other model checking tools such as Simulink and UPPAAL ( [5]), SPIN and nuSMV ( [12]), proB ( [3]), mCRL2 ( [7]), and FDR ( [16]) for the verification of railway control systems. For a comparative study, see [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They describe that trains do not collide and trains do not derail, respectively. The specification of the former is as follows: where hdPos[t] and tlPos [ t ] is the head, respectively tail, position of a train t 3 and no collide is a function defined as follows:…”
Section: Safety Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 99%