2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2010.00278.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baby-led weaning and current UK recommendations - are they compatible?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mothers discussed their experiences of introducing complementary foods to their infant. Although babyled weaning is often seen as a separate and alternative approach to introducing complementary foods, this research shows that there are indeed a number of parallels between this method and traditional approaches as has previously been discussed in the literature (Sachs 2011). Department of Health (2009) on introducing complementary foods places emphasis on an introduction at around 6 months, a gradual introduction of tastes and textures based around family foods and looking for signs of readiness for complementary foods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mothers discussed their experiences of introducing complementary foods to their infant. Although babyled weaning is often seen as a separate and alternative approach to introducing complementary foods, this research shows that there are indeed a number of parallels between this method and traditional approaches as has previously been discussed in the literature (Sachs 2011). Department of Health (2009) on introducing complementary foods places emphasis on an introduction at around 6 months, a gradual introduction of tastes and textures based around family foods and looking for signs of readiness for complementary foods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This typically occurs at around 6 months of age (Rapley 2006). The method thus encourages similar concepts as current Department of Health advice, but places a much greater emphasis on self‐feeding and non‐mashed or puréed foods (Sachs 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Alternatively, we have previously suggested that low levels of maternal control encouraged by BLW and/or associated tendency for breastfeeding in mothers using BLW account for any improved outcomes rather than self‐feeding and absence of purées per se . Furthermore, Sachs has questioned whether BLW is quantifiably different from many parents who introduce solid foods to their infant without considering themselves ‘baby‐led’ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One suggested benefit of BLW is that it facilitates infants' ‘ … gradual transition to solid foods, in their own time and at their own pace … ’ (Rapley , p. 21) and that it allows infants to control how much and what types of foods they consume in the same way that breastfeeding is ‘on demand’ (Sachs ). This may be beneficial as breastfeeding has been suggested to lower the risk of childhood obesity (Arenz et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%