1992
DOI: 10.1088/0143-0815/13/a/022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Back-projection distortions in applied potential tomography images due to non-uniform reference conductivity distributions

Abstract: An investigation was conducted to determine and quantify the distortions in applied potential tomography (APT) images reconstructed from data originating from bodies of non-uniform reference conductivity distributions. The results show that the distortions in the images are dependent on the reference conductivity distribution and on whether the images are formed by back projection along the assumed equipotentials of a uniform reference conductivity distribution or along the equipotentials of the true conductiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The skull acts as a high impedance barrier to current flow, so that a large proportion of current will pass through the path of least resistance within the scalp and a smaller proportion of the applied current will enter the brain. The presence of the skull is expected to attenuate the measured impedance change by a factor of perhaps five (Gibson et al, 2000;Joy et al, 1999) and distort the EIT images so that impedance changes are imaged more centrally than their true position, if the model for the reconstruction algorithm is a homogeneous sphere (Avis et al, 1992;Tidswell et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skull acts as a high impedance barrier to current flow, so that a large proportion of current will pass through the path of least resistance within the scalp and a smaller proportion of the applied current will enter the brain. The presence of the skull is expected to attenuate the measured impedance change by a factor of perhaps five (Gibson et al, 2000;Joy et al, 1999) and distort the EIT images so that impedance changes are imaged more centrally than their true position, if the model for the reconstruction algorithm is a homogeneous sphere (Avis et al, 1992;Tidswell et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing reconstruction algorithms using excitation of adjacent electrodes to image the above impedance changes do not have sufficient sensitivity, owing to the skull's resistivity. The discontinuity between the skull and the more conductive tissues produces distortions in the isopotential paths, which limits the accuracy and spatial resolution of the reconstructed image (Avis et al 1992). The distorted isopotential paths produce a discrepancy between the true positions of impedance changes and their location in the reconstructed image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distorted isopotential paths produce a discrepancy between the true positions of impedance changes and their location in the reconstructed image. Simple correction of backprojection paths has not yielded successful results (Avis et al 1992). It may be possible to overcome this problem by using intracranial electrodes in epilepsy patients (Holder 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that there are only twice opposite excitations, while in [18], the cycle current excitations pattern of adjacent excitation is applied, so the quality of this reconstructed images is different from that in [18]. The fourth column shows the images reconstructed by the LBP algorithm [26] whose difference sensitivity matrices are based on the reference and measured field. The performance index without noise is demonstrated in figure 13.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%