2015
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Back to Gondwanaland: can ancient vicariance explain (some) Indian Ocean disjunct plant distributions?

Abstract: Oceans, or other wide expanses of inhospitable environment, interrupt present day distributions of many plant groups. Using molecular dating techniques, generally incorporating fossil evidence, we can estimate when such distributions originated. Numerous dating analyses have recently precipitated a paradigm shift in the general explanations for the phenomenon, away from older geological causes, such as continental drift, in favour of more recent, long-distance dispersal (LDD). For example, the 'Gondwanan vicar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The African-Malagasy-Indian (S Asian) disjunct distribution has been reported in other plant lineages (Raven and Axelrod 1974), e.g. in Cyphostemma (Vitaceae, Hearn et al 2018;Wen et al 2018) and Exacum (Gentianaceae, Yuan et al 2005;Pirie et al 2015). The closest relatives of the Ivodea-Vepris lineage (Figs.…”
Section: Biogeographic Affinities Of Malagasy Rutaceaementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The African-Malagasy-Indian (S Asian) disjunct distribution has been reported in other plant lineages (Raven and Axelrod 1974), e.g. in Cyphostemma (Vitaceae, Hearn et al 2018;Wen et al 2018) and Exacum (Gentianaceae, Yuan et al 2005;Pirie et al 2015). The closest relatives of the Ivodea-Vepris lineage (Figs.…”
Section: Biogeographic Affinities Of Malagasy Rutaceaementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Cruciata. For the seed fossil, we used lognormal priors with an offset at 5.0 Ma, a mean of 0.7, and a standard deviation of 1.0, as applied by Pirie et al (2015) and Favre et al (2016) . We did not use uniform priors for sect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Lisianthius fossil, we used lognormal priors, with an offset at 33.6 Ma (hard minimum bound, corresponding to the end of the Eocene), a mean of 0.7, and a standard deviation of 1.0, thus covering Middle and Late Eocene, as used by Matuszak et al (2015). For the second fossil, we used lognormal priors (offset 5.0; mean 0.7; standard deviation 1.00), as applied by Pirie et al (2015). This fossil being rather young, it might represent a very conservative minimum age for its clade.…”
Section: Divergence Time Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%