1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1996(96)01463-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backfiring tariffs in vertically related markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased competition in the upstream part of the industry makes the wholesale price less sensitive to changes in the downstream tax rate, which weakens the rent-extraction motive for downstream trade policy. 23 The efficiency motive, on the other hand, is also determined by the degree of downstream competition. The lower the number of firms operating in the downstream market, the stronger the incentives to reduce taxes (or increase subsidies) in order to stimulate competition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased competition in the upstream part of the industry makes the wholesale price less sensitive to changes in the downstream tax rate, which weakens the rent-extraction motive for downstream trade policy. 23 The efficiency motive, on the other hand, is also determined by the degree of downstream competition. The lower the number of firms operating in the downstream market, the stronger the incentives to reduce taxes (or increase subsidies) in order to stimulate competition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But these models do not consider FDI in vertically related oligopolistic industries; models with monopolistic competition in intermediates lack strategic interaction. Our model also helps merge the literature on FDI in oligopolistic markets with the literature on trade policy in vertically related industries, such as Sleuwaegen et al (1998), Ishikawa and Lee (1997), Ishikawa and Spencer (1999), and Jones (1991, 1992).…”
Section: Contrast To Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the present model, as Equation (3) shows, an increase in the trade policy uncertainty pulls up the growth rate of the domestic firm's profit, to accelerate the start time of the export. If this accelerating effect surpasses the standard postponing effect caused by the value of waiting, overall effect accelerates the start time of the export, which we define here as a stochastic version of the backfiring effect that was shown by Ishikawa and Lee (1997) [9] in vertically related deterministic markets. If 1 ε ≧ , on the other hand, graph of φ * is depicted as a decreasing graph on s-φ * space as in Figure 2, showing that increase in the trade policy uncertainty delays the start time of the export, which is consistent with the typical case in the optimal stopping model.…”
Section: Optimal Start Time Of the Exportmentioning
confidence: 99%