2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Background fog subtraction methods in Gafchromic® dosimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An international protocol was adopted for film process and optical signal analysis of the low-energy radiation distribution [ 19 ]. GAF chromic EBT2 film (ISP Technology Inc., Wayne, NJ, USA; Lot # F05090901, expiry date April 2019) was used.…”
Section: Output Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An international protocol was adopted for film process and optical signal analysis of the low-energy radiation distribution [ 19 ]. GAF chromic EBT2 film (ISP Technology Inc., Wayne, NJ, USA; Lot # F05090901, expiry date April 2019) was used.…”
Section: Output Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was set up using the reflective mode because of the film opaque property [2,10,14], an RGB image with a resolution of 72 dpi in 48-bit and no color corrections was applied [11,15]. The image analysis was performed in the red channel and the pixel-by-pixel background fog subtraction method was applied [11,16] using ImageJ software (available at https://imagej.net).…”
Section: Calibration Dosimeter Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, the physicists have developed several systems to measure the radiation dose or, more in general, to characterize the quality of an ionizing radiation field [1]. These include ionization chambers, radiographic and radiochromic film, semiconductor detectors, thermoluminescence and optically stimulated luminescence, scintillation dosimeters and electron spin resonance dosimeters [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. However, current dosimeters are only able to measure the dose in a limited volume (1D dosimeters) or in a plane (2D dosimeters) and thus they cannot provide a dose distribution over larger three dimensional (3D) volumes [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%