2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2014.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Background suppressing Gabor energy filtering

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIn the field of facial emotion recognition, early research advanced with the use of Gabor filters. However, these filters lack generalization and result in undesirably large feature vector size. In recent work, more attention has been given to other local appearance features. Two desired characteristics in a facial appearance feature are generalization capability, and the compactness of representation. In this paper, we propose a novel texture feature inspired by Gabor energy filters, called bac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The feature vectors are z -scored based on the training data before the machine learning step. We compare three feature vector representations: an improved Gabor filter Cruz et al (2015) , Uniform Local Binary Patterns ( Almaev and Valstar, 2013 ), and SIFT features Liu et al (2015) . These features were selected because they provide a good representation of features used currently in literature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feature vectors are z -scored based on the training data before the machine learning step. We compare three feature vector representations: an improved Gabor filter Cruz et al (2015) , Uniform Local Binary Patterns ( Almaev and Valstar, 2013 ), and SIFT features Liu et al (2015) . These features were selected because they provide a good representation of features used currently in literature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This singularity in measurements is a result of efficient artificial augmentation, balanced number of class images, optimal parameters assignment, smart network configuration, and usefulness of transfer learning. The problems arising in most traditional attempts [25][26][27][28] to detect plant diseases follow from handengineered features, image enhancement techniques, and labor-intensive methodologies. These traditional attempts are lean to either a small number images in a class or a limited variety of classes of crops.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the precision is 99.11% whereas the recall and F1-score are 99.49% and 99.29%, respectively. Because of efficient parameter selection during transfer learning, relying on new data augmentation methods, and using fixed number of images in each category, the proposed model [8,9] use a small number images, reducing variability in the dataset. As observed in Table 4, over the last year years, DL techniques have shown a remarkable improvement for plant disease detection as compared to traditional approaches [8,9] such as SIFT, HoG, and SURF because such methods lack the ability of transfer learning, which is used by DL models.…”
Section: B Implementation Details and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%