Proceedings of 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.1995.478612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backstepping designs for jet engine stall and surge control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for optimality » need not satisfy (10), (11) and (13). Specifically, if » is a C function such that (10) is satisfied and (x) 3S(x ), then (14) and (15) imply (16) and (17).…”
Section: Remark 33mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, for optimality » need not satisfy (10), (11) and (13). Specifically, if » is a C function such that (10) is satisfied and (x) 3S(x ), then (14) and (15) imply (16) and (17).…”
Section: Remark 33mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Now, using , where is the ideal change in fluid specific enthalpy which, for a conservative system, is equal to the work done by the compressor rotor, it follows from (7) that (8) The energy delivered to the fluid by the compressor is given by (9) where is the angular velocity of the compressor spool and (10) where , correspond to incidence and frictional losses at the inducer and diffuser, respectively. For details see [21].…”
Section: B Conservation Of Momentummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The backstepping method provides a systematic procedure to find state feedback and Lyapunov function simultaneously. Several works on active surge control using backstepping have been presented afterwards [13]- [16]. However, the backstepping may result in a complicated state feedback and can be difficult to be implemented [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%