2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial-based membrane protein production

Abstract: Escherichia coli is by far the most widely used bacterial host for the production of membrane proteins. Usually, different strains, culture conditions and production regimes are screened for to design the optimal production process. However, these E. coli-based screening approaches often do not result in satisfactory membrane protein production yields. Recently, it has been shown that (i) E. coli strains with strongly improved membrane protein production characteristics can be engineered or selected for, (ii) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
1
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our understanding of how membrane proteins are translocated and folded in E. coli is highly limited, and it appears that the optimal strain for membrane protein production is protein-specific [144]. Currently, C41(DE3), C43(DE3) and Lemo21(DE3) remain the first-choice strains for membrane protein expression.…”
Section: Escherichia Coli Expression Strains and Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our understanding of how membrane proteins are translocated and folded in E. coli is highly limited, and it appears that the optimal strain for membrane protein production is protein-specific [144]. Currently, C41(DE3), C43(DE3) and Lemo21(DE3) remain the first-choice strains for membrane protein expression.…”
Section: Escherichia Coli Expression Strains and Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both electron and X-ray crystallography depend on the successful crystallization of proteins and protein complexes. There have been many improvements in the production of membrane proteins for crystallization (Clark et al, 2011;Schlegel et al, 2014) and the formation and stabilization of crystals (Carpenter et al, 2008;Klara et al, 2016). However, as seen in crystal structures of components of the TtATPase, different subunits of type III secretion systems, as well as the nuclear pore complex (Lee et al, 2010;Worrall et al, 2010;Stuwe et al, 2015), mostly structures of soluble components or extramembrane domains of transmembrane proteins have been solved for large membrane-spanning complexes.…”
Section: Challenges For High-resolution Structural Analysis Of Large mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D'autres laboratoires ont développé des étiquettes peptidiques favorisant l'agrégation ou l'insertion des protéines dans les membranes, telles que Zera ou Mistic [8,9]. Mais ces solutions ne permettent pas actuellement d'entrevoir le début d'une normalisation de la production des protéines membranaires, car leur toxicité est multifactorielle (problème d'insertion dans les membranes, de Comme pour les protéines solubles, la production de protéines membranaires en Escherichia coli reste la plus largement utilisée [4]. Néanmoins, ce modèle n'est pas forcément le plus approprié pour la production de protéines membranaires d'origine eucaryote.…”
unclassified