2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial community structure in maize residue amended soil with contrasting management practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cover crops can impact the soil microbiome by changing soil characteristics (e.g., pH, temperature, and soil water content) which are known to influence soil microbial communities [11,18,23]. In addition, cover crops offer additional organic substrates through the input of plant residues and rhizodeposition, which may impact soil microbial communities [55][56][57].…”
Section: Cover Crops Increase Soil Microbial Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cover crops can impact the soil microbiome by changing soil characteristics (e.g., pH, temperature, and soil water content) which are known to influence soil microbial communities [11,18,23]. In addition, cover crops offer additional organic substrates through the input of plant residues and rhizodeposition, which may impact soil microbial communities [55][56][57].…”
Section: Cover Crops Increase Soil Microbial Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same maize plants were used in this experiment as in the one used in the study reported by Ramírez-Villanueva et al (2015). Briefly, maize seeds were surface-sterilized and germinated on 0.8% agar-water plates.…”
Section: Cultivation Of the Maize Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA was extracted from each soil sample as previously described by Ramírez-Villanueva et al (2015). First, humic and fulvic acids were removed with pyrophosphate and three different cell lysis techniques were applied (Hoffman and Winston, 1987;Sambrook and Russell, 2001;Valenzuela-Encinas et al, 2008) to obtain an optimum representation of all the microorganisms in the soil samples (Carrigg et al, 2007).…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Pcr Amplification Of Bacterial 16s Rrna Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies revealed that diversity and relative abundance of bacterial taxa in the maize rhizosphere and bulk soils showed considerable differences [7,8]. The biomass and the abundance of microorganisms, together with the diversity and the enzyme activities of maize-associated microbial communities can be influenced by the types of fertilization regimes [9][10][11][12][13][14], crop rotation [15,16] and growth stages of the maize plants [17,18]. Previously, Fierer et al [19] studied the effect of different soil nitrogen concentrations on the phylogenetic diversity of bacteria in grassland and crop rotation soils using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, functional diversity by shotgun metagenome sequencing and catabolic activity profiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed differences both in phylogenetic and functional diversity and even in catabolic activity profiles along the nitrogen gradients; however, there were no strong differences in bacterial community structures, but an increase in the proportion of copiotrophic Proteobacteria and Bacteriodetes and a decrease in oligotrophic Acidobacteria was shown. From an ecological point of view, r-strategist copiotrophic bacteria (adapted to nutrient rich environments) were found to be dominant in the early-stage maize plants and in conservation agriculture while they were replaced by K-strategist oligotrophic bacteria (present in nutrient poor environments) around senescent roots and in agricultural soils farmed with conventional practices [11,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%