2020
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10030341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Soil Bacterial Communities from Juvenile Maize Plants of a Long-Term Monoculture and a Natural Grassland

Abstract: Nowadays, one of the most important challenges is to ensure sustainable agricultural management of crops such as maize (Zea mays L.). Long-term crop production, however, may influence the soil properties, the composition and activity of microbial communities. The aim of this study was to compare the catabolic activity and taxonomic diversity of bacterial communities inhabiting the soil of a non-fertilized maize monoculture and a natural grassland. Samples were taken from the horizons A and C in the first part … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we showed that, generally, the Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes were present in lower abundance in the reference soil during the whole analysis period in comparison with soils enriched with plant residues (Figure S5). Many other studies have revealed that these copiotrophic bacteria are abundant in soil that is rich in easily decomposable organic matter [53,54]. The opposite situation was noted for phyla Acidobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Planctomycetes, and Verrucomicrobia, which are oligotrophic (nutrient-poor) and were abundant especially in R soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this study, we showed that, generally, the Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes were present in lower abundance in the reference soil during the whole analysis period in comparison with soils enriched with plant residues (Figure S5). Many other studies have revealed that these copiotrophic bacteria are abundant in soil that is rich in easily decomposable organic matter [53,54]. The opposite situation was noted for phyla Acidobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Planctomycetes, and Verrucomicrobia, which are oligotrophic (nutrient-poor) and were abundant especially in R soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The grassland is 2 km away from the residential area and is avoided by traffic routes, so human disturbance and trampling practically do not affect the study site. The slope is covered with Haplic Chernozem (loamic) soil according to IUSS Working Group WRB [ 56 ], which is characterised by the following physico-chemical properties: pH H2O = 7.1 ± 0.1, pH KCl = 6.8 ± 0.1, C org = 4.00% ± 0.18, N tot = 0.48% ± 0.02, CaCO 3 content by Scheibler calcimeter = 5.07% ± 2.69, plant available P 2 O 5 = 104 ± 46.7 and K 2 O = 260 ± 11.0 mg/kg (ammonium-lactate soluble), NH 4 + -N = 8.57 ± 0.42 mg/kg, nitrate-N = 1.82 ± 0.56 [ 57 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, larger amounts of carbon and nitrogen do not affect the development of oligotrophic bacteria, which include mainly Acidobacteria. This group of bacteria has a more economical life strategy than copiotrophic bacteria and occurs in soils poor in nutrients [45][46][47]. Therefore, the introduction of large amounts of organic matter into the soil can interfere with the natural O:K ratio and thus negatively affect biological soil homeostasis [48].…”
Section: Bacterial Community Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%