2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00259-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial composition of commercial probiotic products as evaluated by PCR-DGGE analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
131
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
131
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, various molecular fingerprinting techniques, using different genetic markers, have proven useful in subspecies discrimination or strain differentiation. A number of studies evaluated the bacterial composition of commercial probiotic products for human consumption (Fasoli et al, 2003;Temmerman et al, 2003;Huys et al, 2006). Despite the availability of various molecular techniques, reports on the evaluation of the composition of probiotic products in China are rare.…”
Section: Molecular Techniques For Evaluation Of Commercial Probioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, various molecular fingerprinting techniques, using different genetic markers, have proven useful in subspecies discrimination or strain differentiation. A number of studies evaluated the bacterial composition of commercial probiotic products for human consumption (Fasoli et al, 2003;Temmerman et al, 2003;Huys et al, 2006). Despite the availability of various molecular techniques, reports on the evaluation of the composition of probiotic products in China are rare.…”
Section: Molecular Techniques For Evaluation Of Commercial Probioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional microbiological methods for studying microbial communities, i.e. counts on differential and selective media followed by identification of isolates, are time consuming and highlight the disadvantages of low selectivity and reciprocal inhibition in plate (Fasoli et al 2003). Only one ISO standard exists for enumerating bifidobacteria in food.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probiotic products should contain viable, defined microorganisms in sufficient numbers. Moreover, correct identification of the bacterial species used and agreement between the species declared on the label and those actually present in the product are both necessary for a probiotic product to be considered reliable (Fasoli et al 2003;Temmerman et al 2003). As stated above, there are still no official or generally accepted ISO standards for analysing the composition of bacterial species in probiotic products in Europe.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attention to such features is important, as it has been repeatedly shown that in about 50% of the probiotic products the identity of recovered microorganisms does not correspond to the information stated on the product label (Yeung et al, 2002;Fasoli et al, 2003;Temmerman et al, 2003;Theunissen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mislabelling may have serious safety implications. For example, mislabelling closely related species of lactobacilli maybe is not too worrying, but failure to properly identify or label the bacterial genus such as products labelling Lactobacillus acidophilus and containing Streptococcus sanguis (Yeung et al, 2002) or failure to list bacterial contents such as Enterococcus (Yeung et al, 2002) or Staphylococcus (Fasoli et al, 2003) are concerning from the point of view of safety of those products. These observations indicate the importance of rigorous quality control at every stage of the production and of each production batch.…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%