2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10354-007-0423-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial contamination of solutions for parenteral administration for single- and multiple-dose vials after multiple use in the hospital

Abstract: Outbreaks traced to bacterial contamination of multiple-dose vials are reported in the literature. During a four-month period, multi-dose vials (MDVs), single-dose vials (SDVs), and vials containing self-prepared admixtures were collected from various wards to analyse sterility of their contents. We examined 68 commercially available MDVs containing sodium chloride 0.9% or heparin with added preservative and 17 single dose vials (SDVs) containing aqua ad injectionem or sodium chloride 0.9% and 11 vials with ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall prevalence of vial contamination in this study was 5.5%, which is consistent with two previous studies from Iran that showed contamination rates of 5.6% and 5.36%, respectively [ 10 , 11 ]. The contamination rate in this study was higher than that of other similar studies conducted in Germany (0.9%) and Austria (4%) [ 15 , 16 ]., In the current study, the length of the study period was longer than that in a previous study in Germany, which collected a sample on a single day, and all 227 MDVs were collected [ 15 ]. Similarly, the study conducted in Austria incorporated only a total of 96 vials from different wards except for intensive care units [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…The overall prevalence of vial contamination in this study was 5.5%, which is consistent with two previous studies from Iran that showed contamination rates of 5.6% and 5.36%, respectively [ 10 , 11 ]. The contamination rate in this study was higher than that of other similar studies conducted in Germany (0.9%) and Austria (4%) [ 15 , 16 ]., In the current study, the length of the study period was longer than that in a previous study in Germany, which collected a sample on a single day, and all 227 MDVs were collected [ 15 ]. Similarly, the study conducted in Austria incorporated only a total of 96 vials from different wards except for intensive care units [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Table 11.15 displays the contamination levels of different products in single-and multiple-dose vials collected in hospital wards. Nogler-Semenitz et al [18] and Mattner and Gastmeier [19] reported a similar conclusion, although the contamination rates were relatively lower in both studies. The findings reveal different rates of contamination.…”
Section: Single-and Multiple-dose Productsmentioning
confidence: 52%