“…Although this relationship seems to be stronger in mammals than in other taxa, such as birds (Bini et al, 2001;Dobson et al, 2003), and might be affected by the scale of analysis, level of data aggregation, type of environment, latitude, taxa, trophic position, census area and method of statistical analysis (see reviews in Cotgrave, 1993;Cyr, 2000;Gaston and Blackburn, 2000;Silva et al, 2001), recent analysis of this relationship underscores the empirical generality of the -3/4 scaling exponent as well as its strong theoretical support (Li, 2002;Belgrano et al, 2002. Furthermore, as shown by Marquet et al (1990), this relationship holds in local communities when a wide spectrum of taxonomic groups are included (see also Cyr et al, 1997;Schmid et al, 2000;Cohen et al, 2003;Mulder et al, 2005; but see Dugan et al, 1995;Navarrete and Menge, 1997), although the exponent is closer to -1 (which is expected when analyzing species in more than one trophic level, see discussion below) and is maintained in the face of perturbations affecting changes in the abundance and identity of species (Fig.·1, see also de Boer and Prins, 2002;Cohen et al, 2003). The existence of temporal invariance in this relationship further testifies to its importance in understanding ecological dynamics (Marquet, 2000).…”