2012
DOI: 10.3889/mjms.1857-5773.2012.0201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacteriology of Wound - Clinical Utility of Gram Stain Microscopy and the Correlation with Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We noticed that 78.4% of pus samples demonstrated bacterial growth in selective medium and agar medium; this rate of isolation of pathogens is relatively higher than those in previous reports, 70.5% in [ 38 ] and 55.5% in [ 39 ]. Out of the total bacterial isolates, 61% were gram-negative bacteria, and 39% were gram-positive bacteria.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…We noticed that 78.4% of pus samples demonstrated bacterial growth in selective medium and agar medium; this rate of isolation of pathogens is relatively higher than those in previous reports, 70.5% in [ 38 ] and 55.5% in [ 39 ]. Out of the total bacterial isolates, 61% were gram-negative bacteria, and 39% were gram-positive bacteria.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…In our present study, 60.20% of pus samples showed bacterial growth. This isolation rate of pathogen is relatively lower (70.50%) than that previously observed in Ethiopia (Azene & Beyene 2011) but higher (55.50%) than that previously observed in Skopje (Kaftandzieva et al 2012). …”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…R.K 3 and Aizza Zafar, Naeem Anwar 1 . The predominant organism identified in 105 isolates was Staphylococcus aureus even though the percentage of gramnegative isolates were high, which coincides with the previous studies and stating that though there was dominance of gramnegative isolates observed in this study, Staphylococcus aureus remained a predominant isolate 8,9,5,7,1,10,3,6 . This study contrasts with the study done by P.R.Fa-Si-Oen, et al 11 where Escherichia coli dominance was reported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%