2004
DOI: 10.1257/0002828043052240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bad Beta, Good Beta

Abstract: This paper explains the size and value "anomalies" in stock returns using an economically motivated two-beta model. We break the beta of a stock with the market portfolio into two components, one reflecting news about the market's future cash flows and one reflecting news about the market's discount rates. Intertemporal asset pricing theory suggests that the former should have a higher price of risk; thus beta, like cholesterol, comes in "bad" and "good" varieties. Empirically, we find that value stocks and sm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

50
498
4
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,071 publications
(555 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
50
498
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These contemporaneous terms imply that both cash flow news, dB t , and discount rate news, dB x t , impact prices. This gives a "badbeta/good-beta" interpretation as in Campbell and Vuolteenaho (2004). Our argument implies that properly specified asset pricing models should have shocks that have a "bad-beta/goodbeta" interpretation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…These contemporaneous terms imply that both cash flow news, dB t , and discount rate news, dB x t , impact prices. This gives a "badbeta/good-beta" interpretation as in Campbell and Vuolteenaho (2004). Our argument implies that properly specified asset pricing models should have shocks that have a "bad-beta/goodbeta" interpretation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…While we are fully aware of the limitations of the CAPM model for predicting investor behavior (e.g. Fama and French, 1995;Fama and French, 2006;Campbell and Vuolteenaho, 2004), our goal here is not to predict or even to recommend investment-type decisions but merely to explore the parallel between financial assets and alums as potential investments using the traditional CAPM risk-return relationship.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we are fully aware of the limitations of the CAPM model for predicting investor behavior (e.g. Fama and French, 1995;Fama and French, 2006;Campbell and Vuolteenaho, 2004), our goal here is not to predict or even to recommend investment-type decisions but merely to explore the parallel between financial assets and alums as potential investments using the traditional CAPM risk-return relationship.To create mutually exclusive and exhaustive asset classes, we divided continuous variables into categories: SAT In preliminary data exploration, we discovered that eight individuals in our dataset were major donors, and their presence determined all subsequent tests and results. We elected to omit them from consideration as they spanned many asset categories but clearly masked the underlying pattern in the remaining 16, 992 observations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we examine the predictive ability of another popular …nancial ratio, namely, the price-earnings ratio. This is motivated by the fact that some studies using US data (for example, Campbell & Vuolteenaho, 2004) …nd that smoothed market price-earnings ratios have better forecasting ability than dividend yields. We carefully construct Japanese price-earnings ratios following the methodology pioneered by Robert Shiller (1989Shiller ( , 2005 and examine their ability to forecast aggregate stock returns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%