2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bagging-based positive-unlabeled learning algorithm with Bayesian hyperparameter optimization for three-dimensional mineral potential mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a random forest initially has only one base learner, it is a decision tree model with random selection generating perturbations, which is characterized by poor performance, poor fitting, low generalization ability, etc. Multiple stochastic decision tree models are integrated in parallel by Bagging, 31 and the results are predicted by voting or averaging between each base learning model. In this study, random forest parameters were determined by grid search, the number of base models was 100, the quality of attribute partitioning was measured using mean square error (MSE), and the default values were used for the remaining parameters.…”
Section: Data Processing and Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a random forest initially has only one base learner, it is a decision tree model with random selection generating perturbations, which is characterized by poor performance, poor fitting, low generalization ability, etc. Multiple stochastic decision tree models are integrated in parallel by Bagging, 31 and the results are predicted by voting or averaging between each base learning model. In this study, random forest parameters were determined by grid search, the number of base models was 100, the quality of attribute partitioning was measured using mean square error (MSE), and the default values were used for the remaining parameters.…”
Section: Data Processing and Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the uncertainty of geological conditions and field measurement errors significantly impact the inversion results. The inversion of hydraulic conductivity can be transformed into an optimization problem by designing an appropriate objective function with a mathematical seepage model [ 12 , 13 ]. Deep learning methods can effectively improve computational efficiency and accuracy of optimization problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of computational technology and the continuous accumulation of geosciences datasets, mineral exploration has developed from near-surface to subsurface, from 2D to 3D, from qualitative to quantitative (Yuan et al, 2019;Zhang Z Q et al, 2021). 3D mineral prospectivity modeling is developed based on the 3D geological modeling and they are both widely applied in the mineral exploration (Houlding, 1994;Li et al, 2015;Xiao et al, 2015;Li et al, 2016;Wang G W et al, 2017;Yang et al, 2017;Mao et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2021;Zhang Z Q et al, 2021;Gao et al, 2023). Since the 1990s, various knowledge-and data-driven learning models have been applied to conduct mineral prospectivity modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the supervised algorithms, some derivative algorithms such as the semi-supervised random forests, one-class support vector machine and isolation forest have occurred (Chen and Wu, 2017;Chen and Wu, 2019;Wang et al, 2020). RF and XGBoost (Chen and Guestrin, 2016) with excellent performance were used as the base learners of baggingbased positive-unlabeled learning algorithm (Zhang Z Q et al, 2021;Gao et al, 2023). In addition, deep learning is outstanding in the field of 2D mineral exploration (Zuo et al, 2019;Yang et al, 2023) and has been applied to 3D mineral exploration (Li et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%