1992
DOI: 10.22230/cjc.1992v17n1a647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balance and Freedom of Speech: Challenge for Canadian Broadcasting

Abstract: The development of Canadian broadcast policy and law respecting "content balance'' (and corollary notions of public "access and reply'' entitlements, "abusive speech,'' and "controversial issues of public importance'') exhibits significant definitional vagueness and discontinuity. The authors summarize the history of policy making in the area, and provide two case studies: one of religious television broadcasting, one of community radio broadcasting. These materials lead them to reject the notion of content ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He suggests that the broadcasting industry as a whole be put in the hands of an independent, accountable public agency-but one that is organized along more participatory democratic principles than the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) consulting with representative user councils, for example. (Cook & Ruggles, 1992, endorse these same principles.) The agency would strive to meet consumer and citizen goals by ensuring broadcasting is program driven (as opposed to policy and/or profit driven).…”
Section: Nationalism and The Democratic Potential Of Psbmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He suggests that the broadcasting industry as a whole be put in the hands of an independent, accountable public agency-but one that is organized along more participatory democratic principles than the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) consulting with representative user councils, for example. (Cook & Ruggles, 1992, endorse these same principles.) The agency would strive to meet consumer and citizen goals by ensuring broadcasting is program driven (as opposed to policy and/or profit driven).…”
Section: Nationalism and The Democratic Potential Of Psbmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Although their features may well be familiar to readers and appear in policy documents at the legislative and regulatory levels (see Cook & Ruggles, 1992, for instance, on how the concept of "balance" has served to advance-and undermine-the democratic goals of PSB and Canadian media policy more generally), such democratic values of accessibility are definitively not part of the popular public discourse around PSB as represented in the national print news media. Within civil society, as the next section of this article indicates, nationalism remains the strong value of PSB.…”
Section: Nationalism and The Democratic Potential Of Psbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These restrictions did not preclude evangelical Christian radio altogether (Cook and Ruggles 1992). One important figure in Canadian evangelical radio was William "Bible Bill"…”
Section: Fractured Vs United: Denominational Cohesion 1925mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These restrictions, however, did not preclude evangelical Christian radio altogether (Cook & Ruggles 1992). One important figure in evangelical radio was William "Bible Bill" Aberhart, a radio broadcaster who used his popularity to launch a political career, becoming Premier of Alberta from 1935 until his untimely demise in 1943 (Stackhouse 1999).…”
Section: Divergence Of Radio Broadcast Policymentioning
confidence: 99%