2017
DOI: 10.24887/0028-2448-2017-3-18-21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balance of the petroleum hydrocarbon compounds in pyrolyzed organic matter of the Bazhenov formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Bazhenov Formation organic matter, its generalized structure, and composition have been analyzed in a range of previous studies [33][34][35][36][37]. Total organic carbon concentration varies from 1 to 25-30 wt.% (mean 8-9 wt.%) and the initial hydrogen index (HI 0 ) values range between 650 and 715 mg HC/g TOC [38][39][40]. The organic matter is type II kerogen with maturity varying along the region from immature (protocatagenesis stage PC3) in the Nyurolskaya Depression to the end of the oil window (mesocatagenesis stage MC3) in the Salym Arch [39,41,42].…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bazhenov Formation organic matter, its generalized structure, and composition have been analyzed in a range of previous studies [33][34][35][36][37]. Total organic carbon concentration varies from 1 to 25-30 wt.% (mean 8-9 wt.%) and the initial hydrogen index (HI 0 ) values range between 650 and 715 mg HC/g TOC [38][39][40]. The organic matter is type II kerogen with maturity varying along the region from immature (protocatagenesis stage PC3) in the Nyurolskaya Depression to the end of the oil window (mesocatagenesis stage MC3) in the Salym Arch [39,41,42].…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows us to distinguish between productive intervals (radiolarites), intervals enriched in phosphates (P 2 O 5 ), and pyrolusite (MnO), as well as the non-productive part of the section, which differ in uranium and organic matter content. The S 0 + S 1 − TOC diagram demonstrates clear differences between the upper, middle, and lower parts of the Bazhenov Formation cross-section [48] and can also be applied for the subdivision into members.…”
Section: Classification Of Productive Intervals By Uranium Content An...mentioning
confidence: 99%