Balancing Heritage Conservation and Sustainable Development – The Case of Bordeaux

Historic urban landscape

“…However, their case studies then go on to analyse or focus on other issues that do not look at how to implement the recommendation. These case studies focus on issues such as (1) the demand for participatory management and the implication of the community in managing a World Heritage Site contributing a conceptual framework and a methodological focus (Dormaels, 2016), (2) the recognition of non-exceptional landscapes which nevertheless are representative of collective memories and identities, mentioning the multi-valued and multi-layered concept (De Medici et al, 2018;Psarra, 2018, p. 250;Sykes and Ludwig, 2015, p. 16), ( 3) the importance of identifying landscape resource attributes and value categories from a landscape perspective (which and where) so that decision-making is consolidated regarding change management (Sanjbod et al, 2016, p. 185) (4) the need to identify tangible and intangible heritage resources as a contribution to sustainable socio-economic development (Lee et al, 2018, p. 549;Sepe, 2014Sepe, , p. 1154), ( 5) the intersection of heritage practice, urban planning and informal communities (Weiss, 2014), ( 6) the need to understand the city connected to the territory (De Medici et al, 2018;Fern andez Adarve, 2015, p. 36), ( 7) the need to preserve symbolic, socio-economic and physical characteristics as a whole (Garc ıa-Hern andez et al, 2017, p. 2), ( 8) the role of modern architecture and its harmonious integration visually (Rodwell, 2008, p. 102), ( 9) the close relationship between architecture, sustainable urban development and landscape (Psarra, 2018, p. 251), ( 10) the interest in applying the HUL approach, making reference to the importance of incorporating citizen participation (Lee et al, 2018, p. 550) in order to avoid the commodification of heritage (Gonz alez Mart ınez, 2017), (11) the contribution of cultural heritage in sustainable development (Appendino and Giliberto, 2018, p. 212, 219;Appendino, 2017), ( 12) taking into account the urban context's economic sustainability to value the cultural heritage (Berg, 2018) or ( 13) the need to consider the HUL approach as an integral part of economic and social development policies (Shamsuddin et al, 2012).…”

Pembinaan kerangka konstruk kelestarian bandar warisan di Malaysia

“…Namun apabila konsep pembangunan lestari diperkembangkan, elemen budaya mula dimasukkan dalam paradigma pembangunan lestari walaupun hanya sebagai sampingan dan tidak diterima sebagai universal (Rana & Piracha, 2007). Manakala sarjana seperti Appendino (2017) dan Wang & Gu (2020) dengan jelas meletakkan warisan budaya sebagai tiang utama dalam pengukuran kelestarian bandar bersama dengan ekonomi, sosial dan alam sekitar (Rajah 1). Jelas menunjukkan bahawa elemen warisan budaya sangat penting dan tidak boleh diabaikan dalam usaha menuju kearah bandar lestari kerana warisan budaya merupakan elemen yang telah bertapak di sesebuah bandar sejak berkurun lama dan telah mempengaruhi gaya hidup komuniti setempat (Wiktor-Mach, 2019).…”

“…Berpaksikan kepada konsep tradisional tersebut, Runnalls (2007); Tweed & Sutherland (2007); Bandarin, Hosagrahar, & Albernaz (2011); Appendino (2017) dan Wiktor-Mach (2019) meletakkan warisan budaya sebagai teras keempat dalam pembangunan lestari khususnya untuk bandar warisan. Kepentingan terhadap warisan budaya diterjemahkan dalam pembangunan lestari adalah kerana ciri-ciri, keunikan dan nilai estetika yang tiada bandingan dengan bandar biasa.…”

“…Selain itu, penilaian juga perlu dibuat sejauhmana proses pemeliharaan dan pemuliharaan di bandar warisan mampu memberi impak yang positif terhadap ekonomi, sosial, alam sekitar dan komuniti. Hubungan saling memberi antara satu sama lain adalah kunci utama dalam usaha kelestarian bandar warisan di Malaysia (Appendino, 2017).…”

The Archaeology of the Postindustrial: Spatial Data Infrastructures for Studying the Past in the Present

“…Postindustrial landscapes face increasing physical development pressures and developing a mutually beneficial balance between heritage conservation and development planning has become increasingly important (Barber, 2013;Bertacchini and Segre 2016;Appendino, 2017). Environmental sustainability considerations are becoming increasingly central to planning and development efforts, and the treatment of tangible heritage must also fit within this paradigm (Balliana et al, 2016;Nocca 2017).…”