Balancing the diet and the budget: Food purchasing practices of food‐insecure families in New Zealand

Abstract

Aim The aims of this study were to examine total food expenditure and the types of food purchased in food‐insecure households with children, to compare these by severity of food insecurity (moderate or low food security) and furthermore to estimate food expenditure as a percentage of net household income. Methods The study was conducted in Dunedin, New Zealand (NZ) (from June 2009 to May 2010), and included low‐income (≤NZ$45 000/year), food‐insecure households with children (n = 165). The main food preparer was interviewed to determine the food security status of the household. Households collected food shopping receipts and recorded all food that was purchased for four weeks. Results Households reported spending NZ$132/week on food. The greatest percentage of food dollars was allocated to the food group meat, fish and poultry (14.5%), followed by fruit and vegetables (13.7%). Households with low food security reported spending less money compared to households with moderate food security on total food and the food groups fruit and vegetables and cereals but not on the food groups meat, fish and poultry or dairy and eggs (excluding milk). Food expenditure was estimated to be more than 30% of net income for households with an annual income of less than NZ$35 000. Conclusions For the core foods fruit, vegetables and cereals, reported food spending was less for households with low food security compared to households with moderate food security. This is likely to contribute to poor health in addition to being an undesirable and stressful condition for a household.

Providing additional money to food-insecure households and its effect on food expenditure: a randomized controlled trial

“…Food-insecure households that had taken part in a previous study (18) were also contacted by mail. Interested participants could contact researchers by a free telephone number or email.…”

Exploring family home food environments: Household resources needed to utilise weekly deliveries of free fruits and vegetables

“…Almost all researchers have concluded that healthy foods are more expensive than unhealthy foods, and, as a percentage of household income, a basket of healthy food costs more for low-income than for high-income families. 3,4,6,[14][15][16] For example, while high-income families need to spend 9% of household income on a basket of healthy foods, low-income families would need to spend 33% of income for the same food basket. 4 This phenomenon was recognised over 100 years ago.…”

Foodbank of Western Australia's healthy food for all

“…Individuals with limited access to food often choose food with high caloric value instead of foods with high nutritional value, a contributing factor to weight gain (Alaimo et al, 2001;Burns, 2004;Drewnowski and Specter, 2004;Handforth et al, 2013;Townsend et al, 2001). People experiencing food insecurity are less likely to eat fruit and vegetables at levels recommended for good health (Gulliford et al, 2003;Hume et al, 2009;Kirkpatrick and Tarasuk, 2008;Smith et al, 2013).…”