2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03991-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baleen whale prey consumption based on high-resolution foraging measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
128
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
1
128
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the consumption estimates by Reilly et al (2004) are highly uncertain and vary considerably according to methods used. Using a novel approach combining lunge feeding frequency and prey density, Savoca et al (2021) estimate that the consumption of krill by cetaceans may be up to three times that previously estimated. As krill predator populations continue to recover, their consumption of krill will increase, and potentially increase competition among other krill predators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the consumption estimates by Reilly et al (2004) are highly uncertain and vary considerably according to methods used. Using a novel approach combining lunge feeding frequency and prey density, Savoca et al (2021) estimate that the consumption of krill by cetaceans may be up to three times that previously estimated. As krill predator populations continue to recover, their consumption of krill will increase, and potentially increase competition among other krill predators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumption estimates suggest that in the most intensively used areas, humpback whales may consume up to 162 kg km À2 day À1 (Figure 3), and fin whales consume up to 415 kg km À2 day À1 . When alternative consumption estimates described by Reilly et al (2004) and Savoca et al (2021) were combined with the high and low confidence bounds, the amount of krill consumed by humpback and fin whales in the study area varied considerably (Appendix S2: Table S7).…”
Section: Whales-at-sea Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, Supplementary Table S4), typical of waters modified by coastal upwelling. Given fin whale estimated daily average consumption of ~ 8 tons of krill 67 , our abundance estimate (median 2383.8, SD 671, CI 1387.9-5068.5) indicate that this sole species might remove ~ 7 × 10 6 tons of krill a year. Considering that the role of large cetaceans in the ecosystem functioning and biogeochemical cycling of the HCE has been traditionally undermined 1,4,7,61 our results highlight the importance that fin and other baleen whales might elicit in HCE structuring [68][69][70][71] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In practice, the excess krill biomass appears to have been eroded during the last quarter of the 20th century by a decline in the primary productivity of the Southern Ocean [ 4 ]. This has been linked to a reduction in the bioavailability of whale-recycled iron [ 4 , 10 , 11 ], as well as to climate-driven declines in sea ice extent and krill density in the Western Antarctic Peninsula and Scotia Sea [ 8 , 12 , 13 , 16 ]. In the case of the Antarctic fur seal, the number of females breeding at a long-term study population on Bird Island shows tight linkage to local krill availability [ 14 ] and there has also been a recent switch from positive to negative dependent pup mortality [ 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These hunted whales would have consumed vast amounts of Antarctic krill ( Euphausia superba ), a shrimp-like crustacean that forms the dominant prey of many mammals and birds of the Southern Ocean [ 8 ]. Consequently, whaling activities in the Southern Ocean are estimated to have produced a surplus of around 147–380 million tonnes of uneaten krill per year [ 6 , 11 ]. This competitive release of krill is thought to explain increases in populations of seals and penguins at South Georgia during the 1940s to 1970s, a top-down hypothesis referred to as the ‘krill surplus hypothesis’ [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%