1988
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3894(88)80026-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ballistic and mechanical properties of HTPB based composite propellants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. Tensile strength of the basic composition is 0.78 MPa and is comparable to 0.7-0.8 MPa reported in literature [11][12][13] for 86 % solid loading propellants. As the result shown in the Table 3 But, in the present study the percentage elongation is lower and Young's modulus is higher for the propellants as compared to reported in literature 11 .…”
Section: A Preparation Of Propellant Samplessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…3. Tensile strength of the basic composition is 0.78 MPa and is comparable to 0.7-0.8 MPa reported in literature [11][12][13] for 86 % solid loading propellants. As the result shown in the Table 3 But, in the present study the percentage elongation is lower and Young's modulus is higher for the propellants as compared to reported in literature 11 .…”
Section: A Preparation Of Propellant Samplessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…AP,o btained from Firefox Enterprises, was included in all propellantf ormulations to servea san oxidizer.P ropellant formulations contained either am onomodal blend of AP with an average size of approximately 250 mmo rabimodal blend of AP with average particle sizes of approximately 250 and 20 mma tafine-to-coarse ratioo f3 0/70. Previous research has shownt hat the overallA Ps ize distribution, mass loading,a nd modality all play roles in how well titania can act as ab urning rate enhancer [ 4,6].A dditionally,t he final mechanical properties of the propellant are influenced by these same parameters [53],a nd previous research has confirmedt hesed ependencies [18,54,55].A ccordingly,t he AP size distributions for both the coarse and fine AP,g enerated by Fluid Energy Co. using Fraunhofer imaging, are shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Propellant Ingredientsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In the 85 %A PCP bimodal series,t he addition of dry powder titania to the propellant enhanced its ductility, but decreased its ultimate strength. The decrease in strength associated with an increase in ductility is typical of polymer-filler composites [51,54,55].T he pre-mixed titania formulation performed similarly to the dry-powder formulation, with as lightly higher ultimate strength. The addition of in-situt itania to the propellant also enhancedi ts ductility,b ut to al esser extent and with am ore-significant reduction in ultimate strength.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manufactured propellants contained only polyfunctional diols in the HTPB R45 M and had a cure ratio of 0.82, which has been shown to yield the greatest ductility [14,19]. Mechanical properties of particulate composites are influenced by particle loading, size, and distribution [21], and previous research has confirmed these dependencies in composite AP/HTPB propellant [15,[22][23][24]. To improve mechanical properties and enhance bonding at the particle/binder interface, plasticizer (dioctyl adipate) and a bonding agent (HX-752) were included in all of the bimodal composite propellants.…”
Section: Mechanical Property Testingmentioning
confidence: 92%