2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccep.2020.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balloon-Based Ablation Technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the energy source for PVI, cryoablation was associated with higher dose area product 7820 (4195-13,853) cGycm 2 versus 7178 (3668-13,423) cGycm 2 (p < .001). In contrast to our data, the fluoroscopy time in this study was not different for radiofrequency catheter ablation with 24 min in comparison to cryoablation with 22(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) min.In a multicenter study, comparing contact force (CF)-guided radiofrequency (RF) with second-generation cryoballoon (CB) ablation Squara et al26 reported a DAP of 4853 cGycm 2 at a mean fluoroscopy time off 19.3 ± 8.2 min in the CB group and a DAP of 4273 cGycm 2 at mean fluoroscopy time of 17.6 ± 11 min in the RF group with comparable efficacy and complication rates in both groups. Procedure times were shorter in the CB group (109.6 ± 40 min) as compared to the RF group (122.5 ± 40.7 min).…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Depending on the energy source for PVI, cryoablation was associated with higher dose area product 7820 (4195-13,853) cGycm 2 versus 7178 (3668-13,423) cGycm 2 (p < .001). In contrast to our data, the fluoroscopy time in this study was not different for radiofrequency catheter ablation with 24 min in comparison to cryoablation with 22(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) min.In a multicenter study, comparing contact force (CF)-guided radiofrequency (RF) with second-generation cryoballoon (CB) ablation Squara et al26 reported a DAP of 4853 cGycm 2 at a mean fluoroscopy time off 19.3 ± 8.2 min in the CB group and a DAP of 4273 cGycm 2 at mean fluoroscopy time of 17.6 ± 11 min in the RF group with comparable efficacy and complication rates in both groups. Procedure times were shorter in the CB group (109.6 ± 40 min) as compared to the RF group (122.5 ± 40.7 min).…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, cryoballoon PVI is associated with high procedural reproducibility and safety 6 despite a shorter learning curve, 12 so that this approach is gaining more and more acceptance. CB ablation is nowadays becoming the first choice in ablation of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation 13 , 14 , 15 even in centers without advanced fluoroscopy units and non‐fluoroscopic imaging capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations