2019
DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ballot Reform as Suffrage Restriction: Evidence from Brazil's Second Republic

Abstract: Few innovations in democratic institutional design are considered as fundamental as the introduction of voting through the use of a uniform, official, and secret ballot. One account claims that the official ballot liberates dependent voters from the dictates of local elites, thereby enhancing democratic competition. Another argues that in contexts of widespread illiteracy, its adoption may be tantamount to a suffrage restriction. This article adjudicates between these views by drawing upon an original data set… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the AB did disenfranchise illiterate voters. In a municipal-level analysis of voting returns from the period, Gingerich (2019) shows that the introduction of the AB in federal deputy elections led to a vertiginous increase in wasted votes, particularly in areas of high illiteracy. The complexity of voting with the AB helps explain this outcome.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the AB did disenfranchise illiterate voters. In a municipal-level analysis of voting returns from the period, Gingerich (2019) shows that the introduction of the AB in federal deputy elections led to a vertiginous increase in wasted votes, particularly in areas of high illiteracy. The complexity of voting with the AB helps explain this outcome.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only municipalities with zero spending in both elections had an inflation-adjusted change in spending of zero. 22 SeeGingerich (2019) andGingerich and Medeiros (2020) for empirical evidence on this point.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleitores eram "feitos" por seus partidos ou, numa definição ostensiva, "fazer eleitores" diz respeito à prática de mobilizar eleitores, alistando-os, levando-os para votar e entregando aos mesmos as chamadas cédulas partidárias. É importante frisar que somente em 1955 passou a existir algum tipo de cédula oficial para o cargo de presidente da República -outros cargos, como eleições proporcionais em cidades numerosas, apenas em 1958 -, entregue para ser preenchida pelo eleitor no momento do voto (GINGERICH, 2019). No momento aqui analisado, partidos e políticos precisavam empenhar recursos na mobilização de eleitores, que não votariam se não fossem alistados e recebessem a cédula impressa pelo partido -como mostra o registro feito poucos anos depois, com entrevistas de cabos políticos locais feito por Orlando de Carvalho em Minas Gerais (CARVALHO, 1956) Neste trabalho, é argumentado que Adhemar venceu principalmente por ter votos na capital e na cidade de Santos, os principais centros urbanos da época.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified