2022
DOI: 10.1080/01629778.2022.2040554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baltic topmost superlexical prefixes as the left periphery of the verb: the permissive, the restrictive, the negative, and the debitive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In his analysis for Italian, Rizzi (1997) demonstrates that, in fact, the CP is not uniform and consists of as many as four functional projections: the Force Phrase (ForceP), the Topic Phrase (TopP), the Focus Phrase (FocP), and the Finiteness Phrase (FinP), thereby proposing the split-CP hypothesis . The present analysis stems from the generative syntactic analysis of the Baltic verb (Korostenskiene 2017(Korostenskiene , 2022 .…”
Section: Diachronic Change Of False Friends: Interpreters' Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his analysis for Italian, Rizzi (1997) demonstrates that, in fact, the CP is not uniform and consists of as many as four functional projections: the Force Phrase (ForceP), the Topic Phrase (TopP), the Focus Phrase (FocP), and the Finiteness Phrase (FinP), thereby proposing the split-CP hypothesis . The present analysis stems from the generative syntactic analysis of the Baltic verb (Korostenskiene 2017(Korostenskiene , 2022 .…”
Section: Diachronic Change Of False Friends: Interpreters' Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By examining their perceptions, a researcher aims to gain insights into how they envision integrating contemporary concepts, interdisciplinary approaches, and inclusive practices within the social humanities curriculum. Several studies come from Korostenskiene (2022), who stated that the analysis of concern between the interacting parties revealed manifestations of shared concern related to everyday issues and the desire of school educators to feel more concern from students at the curriculum level. From a social constructivist perspective, school staff sought less control internally and at the municipal level [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies come from Korostenskiene (2022), who stated that the analysis of concern between the interacting parties revealed manifestations of shared concern related to everyday issues and the desire of school educators to feel more concern from students at the curriculum level. From a social constructivist perspective, school staff sought less control internally and at the municipal level [13]. Furthermore, Zeichner (n.d.), in his research, finds that all are concerned with reorganizing teacher perceptions and fostering some form of questioning about teaching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%