2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.73.035310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Band gap of theGe(111)c(2×8)surface by scanning tunneling spectroscopy

Abstract: The surface band gap of the 8) Ge(111)c(2× surface at low temperature is determined on the basis of scanning tunneling spectroscopy. Electrostatic potential computations permit evaluation of tip-induced band bending, from which a correction to the energy scale of the observed spectra is made. Parameter values in the computations are constrained by comparison of the observed spectrum with known spectral features, including high-lying conduction band features derived from first-principles computations. The surfa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To extract the position of onset bias from measured (dI/dV)/(I/V), STS modeling was employed as shown by the dashed lines; the detailed method is described in previous STM/STS studies. 46,47 Note the standard error is obtained by the fitting process in STS. The given uncertainties provided by the present fitting employing leastsquares fitting are statistical, are less than thermal broadening, and do not account for band edge states.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extract the position of onset bias from measured (dI/dV)/(I/V), STS modeling was employed as shown by the dashed lines; the detailed method is described in previous STM/STS studies. 46,47 Note the standard error is obtained by the fitting process in STS. The given uncertainties provided by the present fitting employing leastsquares fitting are statistical, are less than thermal broadening, and do not account for band edge states.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the apparent gap measured with tunneling spectroscopy can significantly differ from the intrinsic bandgap in the density of states of the sample, as it has been observed, e.g., on the surfaces of Ge(111) [9], FeS 2 (100) [10], and ZnO [11]. Moreover, TIBB can also cause the ionization of donors/acceptors in the semiconductor [12][13][14], and the effect has even been used in tip-induced quantum dot experiments [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being able to quantitatively calculate TIBB is necessary for the interpretation of data: Only if the values of TIBB are known, can the intrinsic bandgap be retrieved from the data, and the binding energies of the donors/acceptors can be extracted. Using the known dielectric constants and carrier concentration, this is often done for semiconductors with a Poisson's equation solver developed by Feenstra [16], yielding apparent bandgaps around 15-20% larger than the intrinsic ones [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As commonly observed in tunneling experiments on semiconductors, a tip-induced band bending [23] alters the absolute energy scale and complicates the interpretation of the spectra, especially at low temperatures. In particular, the experimental gaps are usually overestimated [24,25]. Figures 3(f) and 3(g) show the tip-sample energy diagram of the junction at equilibrium (V tip = 0).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(k)], because an accumulation of holes occurs at the top of the valence band at low voltages. These holes strongly screen the tip's negative charge at higher voltages [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%